From: "Austin S. Hemmelgarn" <ahferroin7@gmail.com>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>,
Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com>
Cc: Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@gmail.com>,
Btrfs BTRFS <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 64-btrfs.rules and degraded boot
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2016 14:04:50 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44c18e92-69b4-1409-1bf3-b1d08f6f84db@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJCQCtSZ=7v5PgD4mYKhayg03UfVqCV0ADBSjTsFDHiVcdxAjw@mail.gmail.com>
On 2016-07-06 13:19, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 3:51 AM, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 3) can we query btrfs whether it is mountable in degraded mode?
>> according to documentation, "btrfs device ready" (which udev builtin
>> follows) checks "if it has ALL of it’s devices in cache for mounting".
>> This is required for proper systemd ordering of services.
>
> Where does udev builtin use btrfs itself? I see "btrfs ready $device"
> which is not a valid btrfs user space command.
>
> I never get any errors from "btrfs device ready" even when too many
> devices are missing. I don't know what it even does or if it's broken.
>
> This is a three device raid1 where I removed 2 devices and "btrfs
> device ready" does not complain, it always returns silent for me no
> matter what. It's been this way for years as far as I know.
>
> [root@f24s ~]# lvs
> LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move
> Log Cpy%Sync Convert
> 1 VG Vwi-a-tz-- 50.00g thintastic 2.55
> 2 VG Vwi-a-tz-- 50.00g thintastic 4.00
> 3 VG Vwi-a-tz-- 50.00g thintastic 2.54
> thintastic VG twi-aotz-- 90.00g 5.05 2.92
> [root@f24s ~]# btrfs fi show
> Label: none uuid: 96240fd9-ea76-47e7-8cf4-05d3570ccfd7
> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 2.26GiB
> devid 1 size 50.00GiB used 3.00GiB path /dev/mapper/VG-1
> devid 2 size 50.00GiB used 2.01GiB path /dev/mapper/VG-2
> devid 3 size 50.00GiB used 3.01GiB path /dev/mapper/VG-3
>
> [root@f24s ~]# btrfs device ready /dev/mapper/VG-1
> [root@f24s ~]#
> [root@f24s ~]# lvchange -an VG/1
> [root@f24s ~]# lvchange -an VG/2
> [root@f24s ~]# btrfs dev scan
> Scanning for Btrfs filesystems
> [root@f24s ~]# lvs
> LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move
> Log Cpy%Sync Convert
> 1 VG Vwi---tz-- 50.00g thintastic
> 2 VG Vwi---tz-- 50.00g thintastic
> 3 VG Vwi-a-tz-- 50.00g thintastic 2.54
> thintastic VG twi-aotz-- 90.00g 5.05 2.92
> [root@f24s ~]# btrfs fi show
> warning, device 2 is missing
> Label: none uuid: 96240fd9-ea76-47e7-8cf4-05d3570ccfd7
> Total devices 3 FS bytes used 2.26GiB
> devid 3 size 50.00GiB used 3.01GiB path /dev/mapper/VG-3
> *** Some devices missing
>
> [root@f24s ~]# btrfs device ready /dev/mapper/VG-3
> [root@f24s ~]#
You won't get any output from it regardless, you have to check the
return code as it's intended to be a tool for scripts and such.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-05 18:53 64-btrfs.rules and degraded boot Chris Murphy
2016-07-05 19:27 ` Kai Krakow
2016-07-05 19:30 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-05 20:10 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-06 9:51 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-06 11:45 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-06 11:55 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-06 12:14 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-06 12:39 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-06 12:48 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-07 16:52 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-07 18:23 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-07 18:58 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-07 19:14 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-07 19:59 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-07 20:20 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-08 12:24 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-11 21:07 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-12 15:34 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-07 20:13 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-07 19:41 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-06 12:49 ` Tomasz Torcz
2016-07-06 17:19 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-06 18:04 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn [this message]
2016-07-06 18:23 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-06 18:29 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-06 19:17 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-07-06 20:00 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-07 17:00 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-06 18:24 ` Andrei Borzenkov
2016-07-06 18:57 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-07 17:07 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2016-07-07 16:37 ` Goffredo Baroncelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44c18e92-69b4-1409-1bf3-b1d08f6f84db@gmail.com \
--to=ahferroin7@gmail.com \
--cc=arvidjaar@gmail.com \
--cc=hurikhan77@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).