From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s)
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2018 11:18:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44ea10b7-736c-792e-51e0-40434024da74@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180718030801.31617-1-anand.jain@oracle.com>
Please ignore this. There is a line of code which is un-commit.
I am sending this series again. Sorry for the noise.
Thanks, Anand
On 07/18/2018 11:07 AM, Anand Jain wrote:
> v7:
> Availalbe for pull from
> btrfs-progs:
> git@github.com:asj/btrfs-progs.git forget
> btrfs.ko:
> git@github.com:asj/btrfs-devel.git misc-next-jul18
>
> Use struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args (instead of struct
> btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v2) as its inline with other ioctl
> btrfs-control
> The CLI usage remains same. However internally the ioctl flag is not
> required to delete all the unmounted devices. Instead leave
> btrfs_ioctl_vol_args::name NULL.
>
> v6:
> Use the changed fn name btrfs_free_stale_devices().
>
> Change in title:
> Old v5:
> Cover-letter:
> [PATCH v5] Add cli and ioctl to ignore a scanned device
> Kernel:
> [PATCH v5] btrfs: introduce feature to ignore a btrfs device
> Progs:
> [PATCH v5] btrfs-progs: add 'btrfs device ignore' cli
>
> v5:
> Adds feature to delete all stale devices
> Reuses btrfs_free_stale_devices() fn and so depends on the
> patch-set [1] in the ML.
> Uses struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v2 instead of
> struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args as arg
> Does the device path matching instead of btrfs_device matching
> (we won't delete the mounted device as btrfs_free_stale_devices()
> checks for it)
> v4:
> No change. But as the ML thread may be confusing, so resend.
> v3:
> No change. Send to correct ML.
> v2:
> Accepts review from Nikolay, details are in the specific patch.
> Patch 1/2 is renamed from
> [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: refactor btrfs_free_stale_device() to get device list delete
> to
> [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: add function to device list delete
>
> Adds cli and ioctl to forget a scanned device or forget all stale
> devices in the kernel.
>
> Anand Jain (1):
> btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device
>
> fs/btrfs/super.c | 3 +++
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 9 +++++++++
> fs/btrfs/volumes.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/btrfs.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> Anand Jain (1):
> btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices
>
> cmds-device.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> ioctl.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-18 3:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-18 3:07 [PATCH v7] Add cli and ioctl to forget scanned device(s) Anand Jain
2018-07-18 3:08 ` [PATCH v7] btrfs: introduce feature to forget a btrfs device Anand Jain
2018-07-18 3:08 ` [PATCH v7] btrfs-progs: add cli to forget one or all scanned devices Anand Jain
2018-07-18 3:18 ` Anand Jain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=44ea10b7-736c-792e-51e0-40434024da74@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).