public inbox for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Peterson <lavajoe@gentoo.org>
To: Dongjun Shin <djshin90@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>,
	Miguel Sousa Filipe <miguel.filipe@gmail.com>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Btrfs Development List <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] btrfs-progs: convert to autotools
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 00:38:39 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4853676F.6050700@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7fe698080806132310v4573dac5neb0b64fa871f3c4b@mail.gmail.com>

Dongjun Shin wrote:
> I expect Jeff's work will make it easier for distro (or anyone) to include
> btrfs and btrfs-progs as experimental packages. More people can test
> btrfs without worring about the build process and dependency.
> 
> However, I'm not sure if btrfs is ready for testing by non-developers.

:)

I've already put btrfs & btrgs-progs into Gentoo Linux, and I'm
naturally curious how many Gentoo users have tried it out as a result.
The packages are masked as "testing" (not stable), and they display the
"Btrfs is under heavy development..." warning, of course.

And Gentoo is used to handling autotools, so I can adjust the ebuild to
deal with this if needed.

Since Gentoo has its own way of specifying which kernel to build modules
against, as long as I can control this (I currently pass in a custom
"KERNELDIR"), things should work fine.

					-Joe

  reply	other threads:[~2008-06-14  6:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-06-13 20:09 [patch 0/5] btrfs-progs: Create libbtrfs and package it up Jeff Mahoney
2008-06-13 20:09 ` [patch 1/5] btrfs-progs: convert to autotools Jeff Mahoney
2008-06-14  2:09   ` Miguel Sousa Filipe
2008-06-14  5:22     ` Jeff Mahoney
2008-06-14  6:10       ` Dongjun Shin
2008-06-14  6:38         ` Joe Peterson [this message]
2008-06-13 20:09 ` [patch 2/5] btrfs-progs: Test for sparse support in configure Jeff Mahoney
2008-06-13 20:09 ` [patch 3/5] btrfs-progs: Restructure code layout, create libbtrfs Jeff Mahoney
2008-06-13 20:09 ` [patch 4/5] btrfs-progs: Add RPM spec file support Jeff Mahoney
2008-06-13 20:09 ` [patch 5/5] btrfs-progs: Script to restructure the source as needed by patch 3 Jeff Mahoney
2008-06-13 20:29 ` [patch 0/5] btrfs-progs: Create libbtrfs and package it up Christoph Hellwig
2008-06-13 17:17   ` Jeff Mahoney
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-16 12:00 [patch 1/5] btrfs-progs: convert to autotools Kai Moonbourn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4853676F.6050700@gentoo.org \
    --to=lavajoe@gentoo.org \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=djshin90@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeffm@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.filipe@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox