From: Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: parent transid verify failed + level verify failed
Date: Sun, 19 Nov 2023 19:41:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4868643.GXAFRqVoOG@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4896535.31r3eYUQgx@lichtvoll.de>
Martin Steigerwald - 19.11.23, 17:41:17 CET:
> / was not mountable anymore after booting into GRML. Made image with dd
> and restored from backup onto a newly created BTRFS.
I at least have a possible explanation.
Yesterday I experienced 6.7-almost-rc2 not hibernating correctly, but
instead hanging with black screen. I rebooted into 6.6.1. Last thing I did
was remove 6.7-almost-rc2 and hibernate.
In the morning I was greeted by GRUB command line prompt for a reason I do
not understand yet either. I recovered from this with two GRML sessions.
For that at least I unlocked LUKS and mounted / and /boot in GRML. If my
memory is correct after I fixed booting up in these two GRML sessions,
kernel 6.6.1 resumed from hibernation. That does make some session as in
the GRML session I did not touch the swap volume. So I bet the hibernation
image was not invalidated. However that would explain the corruption on /
filesystem. Cause it was mounted in between and then the kernel resumed
from a hibernation image with outdated in-memory data structures for
BTRFS.
If my memory and analysis is correct this would easily explain the
corruption on /. Still not sure what happened to /home. I think I did not
touch it on attempting to repair GRUB. However I am not 100% sure about
that.
Would be interesting to know whether diagnostic data would fit that
explanation.
In case that is correct, then I think it would be good that in case I ever
need to fix up GRUB again I also activate swap volume within GRML in the
hope to invalidate the hibernation image. But I am not completely sure
whether activating swap would be enough for that.
> /home also had errors. Did not take a chance. Scrubbed it, updated a
> backup with good old rsync, recreated filesystem and restored from
> updated backup.
Best,
--
Martin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-19 18:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-19 11:34 parent transid verify failed + level verify failed Martin Steigerwald
2023-11-19 16:41 ` Martin Steigerwald
2023-11-19 18:41 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4868643.GXAFRqVoOG@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox