Re: btrfsctl -A not returning useful information

Ahmed Kamal
2008-07-18T18:25:43Z

Thanks Linda, I located the kernel message. Is it normal such issues
are not tracked in the project's bugzilla:
http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Btrfs
which only contains 5 bugs ?!

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hp.com> wrote:
> Ahmed Kamal wrote:
>>
>> [root@btrfs progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdb
>> ioctl returns 0
>> [root@btrfs progs-unstable]# btrfsctl -A /dev/sdc
>> ioctl returns 0
>>
>>
>> /dev/sdb has a btrfs, while /dev/sdc is blank. What's that output
>> supposed to mean ? Is it a bug ?
>
> I think not so much of a bug as not completely implemented.
> If you look in /var/log/messages or where every your kernel
> messages go, you'll see information about the file system on
> the device. At least that's how it worked for me.
>
> -- ljk
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>