From: Eric Whitney <eric.whitney@hp.com>
To: Tracy Reed <treed@tracyreed.org>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression/functional test suite?
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:11:19 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <491C97F7.6030504@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081113192038.GC9606@tracyreed.org>
Tracy:
There's not yet an official automated regression test suite for btrfs,
but that's one of Chris Mason's V1.0 goals. To that end, I've begun
work on a suite I hope he'll find acceptable. The idea is to make it
easy for a broad range of users to contribute testing effort and
results. System and storage diversity will be very helpful in shaking
out btrfs bugs.
My plan is to reuse existing file system test code or test cases from a
number of sources where applicable and to add new test code where btrfs
features require it. The test suite will be released in stages as it
grows in coverage and capability.
Until then, with Chris' caveat that btrfs isn't yet ready for production
use and that work remains to be done in some areas, it's always useful
to run tests or benchmarks you find important or interesting. I know
Chris and the other btrfs developers like all the testing they can get.
Eric
Tracy Reed wrote:
> I am watching the btrfs project with great interest and looking
> forward to the blessing of the final on-disk format (which I
> understand is coming soon) and giving it a spin in my test
> environment. Like so many others I have been disappointed that the
> very impressive ZFS filesystem isn't available on Linux in any
> meaningful way and see btrfs as the way around this and ultimately a
> better choice. Hopefully btrfs has learned from ZFS and can leapfrog
> it in some areas.
>
> This leads me to a question: I have been following this list for a
> while and have not see anyone mention any sort of regression testing
> or automated functional test suite being run against btrfs. This would
> seem to be critically important for something like a filesystem. Does
> it exist?
>
> I have access to a large amount of disk storage and storage systems
> and would be happy to dedicate a machine with a significant amount of
> disk in various configurations to do constant functional testing of
> btrfs. I know you may already such resources since the project is
> supported by Oracle etc. but I want to do whatever I can to help
> things along. I'm more of a system administrator than a C coder or
> filesystem expert so I can't offer code but perhaps I can help in
> another material way.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-13 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-13 19:20 Regression/functional test suite? Tracy Reed
2008-11-13 21:11 ` Eric Whitney [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=491C97F7.6030504@hp.com \
--to=eric.whitney@hp.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=treed@tracyreed.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox