From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tomasz Chmielewski Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: btrfs file system size should be bigger then 256m Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:44:10 +0100 Message-ID: <49621CBA.2080802@wpkg.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: List-ID: > This has been bothering me for some time. Why does btrfs need to have a > disk greater then 256M? I could see a much smaller limit, say 16M but > why so much? The file system itself does not need that much space for > its own use. In other words, 256M limit rather disqualifies btrfs as a filesystem i.e. for /boot, doesn't it? -- Tomasz Chmielewski http://wpkg.org