From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:44:39 -0800 Message-ID: <496843D7.4070900@zytor.com> References: <4966AB74.2090104@zytor.com> <20090109133710.GB31845@elte.hu> <20090109204103.GA17212@elte.hu> <20090109213442.GA20051@elte.hu> <1231537320.5726.2.camel@brick> <20090109231227.GA25070@elte.hu> <20090110010125.GA31031@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Linus Torvalds , Harvey Harrison , Andi Kleen , Chris Mason , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins , Matthew Wilcox , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , linux-btrfs , Thomas Gleixner , Nick Piggin , Peter Morreale , Sven Dietrich To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090110010125.GA31031@elte.hu> List-ID: Ingo Molnar wrote: > > - Headers could probably go back to 'extern inline' again. At not small > expense - we just finished moving to 'static inline'. We'd need to > guarantee a library instantiation for every header include file - this > is an additional mechanism with additional introduction complexities > and an ongoing maintenance cost. > I think I have a pretty clean idea for how to do this. I'm going to experiment with it over the next few days. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.