From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: gcc inlining heuristics was Re: [PATCH -v7][RFC]: mutex: implement adaptive spinning Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:20:23 -0800 Message-ID: <496A9AD7.5040901@zytor.com> References: <1231676801.25018.150.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20090111181307.GM26290@one.firstfloor.org> <20090111201427.GP26290@one.firstfloor.org> <1231704939.25018.548.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <20090111203441.GQ26290@one.firstfloor.org> <20090112001255.GR26290@one.firstfloor.org> <20090112005228.GS26290@one.firstfloor.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Linus Torvalds , David Woodhouse , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Harvey Harrison , Chris Mason , Peter Zijlstra , Steven Rostedt , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins , Matthew Wilcox , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , linux-btrfs , Thomas Gleixner , Nick Piggin , Peter Morreale , Sven Dietrich , jh@suse.cz To: Andi Kleen Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090112005228.GS26290@one.firstfloor.org> List-ID: Andi Kleen wrote: > > Weird. I wonder where this strange restriction comes from. It indeed > makes this much less useful than it could be :/ > Most likely they're collapsing at too early of a stage. -hpa -- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.