From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: jim owens <jowens@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Status of btrfs-unstable-standalone?
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 14:17:47 -0500
Message-ID: <4993245B.30707@hp.com>
References: <20090211170950.GA19251@tux64-01>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: Lee Trager <lt73@cs.drexel.edu>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20090211170950.GA19251@tux64-01>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

Lee Trager wrote:
> I've noticed that the btrfs-unstable-standalone repository hasn't been
> updated in over three weeks. It seems all active development is taking
> place on btrfs-unstable. What is happening to the
> btfs-unstable-standalone repository? Will all future development only be
> on btrfs-unstable or is there some other reason
> btrfs-unstable-standalone hasn't been updated?

Chris was having a problem with the scripts to make the
standalone from the main tree.  All submits go to the
main tree first.  I'm sure the only reason the standalone
is not being updated is that Chris has not had time to
fix the scripts.  Someone else who knows git and scripting
might be able to do that for him.

jim