From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Grigory Makarevich Subject: Re: Btrfs experimental branch updates Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 15:13:15 -0400 Message-ID: <49BD534B.7030303@gmail.com> References: <1236959774.17095.3.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Chris Mason Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1236959774.17095.3.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> List-ID: Dear All, I was wondering if the experimental branch is smth. different or it is the same git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable-standalone.git That repository does not seem to have any branches other than head and master. Thank you, Best regards, Grigory Makarevich Chris Mason wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've rebased the experimental branch to include most of the > optimizations I've been working on. > > The two major changes are doing all extent tree operations in delayed > processing queues and removing many of the blocking points with btree > locks held. > > In addition to smoothing out IO performance, these changes really cut > down on the amount of stack btrfs is using, which is especially > important for kernels with 4k stacks enabled (fedora). > > -chris > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >