Re: Updated performance results

Chris Mason
2009-07-28T20:23:55Z

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:12:38PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:24:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> >>>Sure, will try to get to it tomorrow.
> >>Sorry, I missed a fix in the experimental branch. I'll push out a
> >>rebased version in a few minutes.
> >>
> >
> >Ok, the rebased version is ready to use.
> New results are up for both with and without nodatacow. Not much change.
>
> http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History.html
>
> Have another run going with nodatacow and ssd.

Hi Steve,

I think I'm going to start tuning something other than the
random-writes, there is definitely low hanging fruit in the large file
creates workload ;) Thanks again for posting all of these.

The history graph has 2.6.31-rc btrfs against 2.6.29-rc ext4. Have you
done more recent runs on ext4?

-chris