From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tore Anderson Subject: Re: Crash in __btrfs_reserve_extent Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 20:14:05 +0200 Message-ID: <4A7B1D6D.6090402@redpill-linpro.com> References: <4A7A7F9F.1080809@redpill-linpro.com> <4A7A9A04.5010006@redpill-linpro.com> <20090806135436.GD3655@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com> <4A7AE579.1050403@redpill-linpro.com> <20090806142750.GE3655@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com> <4A7B15DD.2010101@redpill-linpro.com> <20090806180432.GG3655@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Hugo Mills To: Josef Bacik Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090806180432.GG3655@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com> List-ID: * Josef Bacik > What kernel are you running? I need to get a look at what code you > are on. Thanks for the image, I'm having some trouble getting it to > work, but I will let you know what I come up with. I was running 2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE at the time of the crash, and when I've been having problems. I see that there's a new F11 kernel out - I'll try to upgrade to that one and will let you know if there's any change (I doubt it - there's no mention of btrfs-related changes). Here's the output from btrfs-show, just figured out that I shouldn't have supplied any arguments (thanks to Robert F=F6rster): Label: none uuid: 94762921-dbc0-4faf-a4e5-f5acdaf305a8 Total devices 1 FS bytes used 15.82GB devid 1 size 227.53GB used 227.53GB path /dev/root I just tried to make a new image with btrfs-image from btrfs-progs-unstable (using "btrfs-image -c 9 /dev/vg_echo/lv_root image2.Z"). Unlike when making the first image, the file system was mounted. The image is at - is that any better? Best regards, --=20 Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ Tel: +47 21 54 41 27 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" = in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html