Re: Mass-Hardlinking Oops

jim owens
2009-10-12T18:17:11Z

John Dong wrote:
>
> I don't think that's a good counterargument for why this is not a bug.

it is not a "bug". hard links are not a required feature of all
filesystems nor is a defined large number required for those with
hard links.

> Can't think of any off the top of my head for Linux, but definitely in
> OS X Time Machine can easily create 200+ hardlinks.

so 311 is 50% than the app uses... plenty of growth.

jim