From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steven Pratt Subject: Re: nodatacsum broken? Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 11:40:01 -0600 Message-ID: <4B018E71.3000003@austin.ibm.com> References: <4B017C63.5000600@austin.ibm.com> <20091116172327.GD27677@think> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed To: Chris Mason , linux-btrfs Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20091116172327.GD27677@think> List-ID: Chris Mason wrote: > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:22:59AM -0600, Steven Pratt wrote: > >> Did we break the ability to run with -o nodatacsum somewhere along >> the way? I had not run just this option in a while (usually doing >> nodatacow which implies nodatacsum). Just did a full run with just >> nodatacsum and it looks like we still did csums. >> >> from proc/mounts: >> >> /dev/ffsbdev1 on /mnt/ffsb1 type btrfs (rw,nodatacsum) >> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > This should be mount -o nodatasum. > > Oops. My bad. Re-running. > 2.6.33 will have a patch from Sage to fail mounting when we don't > recognize the option instead of silently pretending it worked. I just > didn't want to introduce it this late in the 2.6.32-rc series. > Good. Steve > -chris > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >