From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: TARUISI Hiroaki Subject: Re: BUG: Link from sub volume, then remove the subvolume -> wrong link Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:00:04 +0900 Message-ID: <4B297484.8010408@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <200912112054.25986.kreijack@libero.it> <4B22E2D8.7020706@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B23E378.1090905@mit.edu> <4B257BF4.5060807@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B26D504.3080201@jp.fujitsu.com> <4B270ABE.5090109@myrealbox.com> <934f64a20912150931q46aea2eer12bc907ecb0137fc@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: davidnicol@gmail.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <934f64a20912150931q46aea2eer12bc907ecb0137fc@mail.gmail.com> List-ID: Supporting it may be not so confusing, but it may need a little format change to record tree and inode number. I think it's not so acceptable. Regards, taruisi (2009/12/16 2:31), David Nicol wrote: > how about supporting the operation, as a feature, and allowing a file > to be in two different subvolumes at the same time? Would that make > the link semantics too confusing? >