From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Lutomirski Subject: Re: Do you think it's time to tag a new version number for btrfs-progs? Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 08:47:18 -0500 Message-ID: <4B94FFE6.7040003@mit.edu> References: <4B90B327.9090707@linux.intel.com> <4B9329EA.8080305@mit.edu> <201003071547.59879.kreijack@libero.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: kreijack@libero.it Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201003071547.59879.kreijack@libero.it> List-ID: Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > On Sunday 07 March 2010, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> Zhu Yanhai wrote: >>> Hi Chris, >>> The latest release of btrfs-progs is still v0.19, at 2009-06-11. > As it >>> already has some major features since then, do you think it's time > to >>> give it a 0.20 version number and release? It will be nice for the >>> various Linux distribution teams to integrate. >> Have recent patches even been committed anywhere public? >> btrfs-progs-unstable.git hasn't been updated since November. >> > > See the "subvol" branch. It was updated 6 day ago > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-progs- > unstable.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/subvol Thanks. That's what I get for not scrolling down far enough. --Andy