From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Miao Xie Subject: Re: wanted X found X-1 but you got X-2 Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 09:04:27 +0800 Message-ID: <4C56199B.8090400@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <20100729131103.323870@gmx.net> <4C526516.30709@cn.fujitsu.com> <20100730071354.257500@gmx.net> <20100731163424.105410@gmx.net> Reply-To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Adi Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100731163424.105410@gmx.net> List-ID: Hi, Adi On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:34:24 +0200, Adi wrote: > ok, i have tried the 2.6.35-rc6 kernel, as TiCPU on #btrfs suggested, but i also got an error. i don't think it has something to do with kcrypt, as i can mount another partition without any problems. [snip] > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:603! > invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT [snip] > Call Trace: > [] ? kcryptd_crypt+0x0/0x360 > [] ? bio_endio+0x11/0x30 > [] ? bio_endio+0x11/0x30 > [] ? bio_endio+0x11/0x30 > [] ? worker_thread+0xf2/0x230 > [] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x230 > [] ? schedule+0x1ab/0x4c0 > [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40 > [] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x230 > [] ? kthread+0x74/0x80 > [] ? kthread+0x0/0x80 > [] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10 It seems this problem is the same as the one I have fixed. Could you try to applied the following patches and test again? http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/29/86 http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/29/84 http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/29/82 Thanks Miao