linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>,
	Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ito <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V2 3/3] btrfs: fix panic caused by direct IO
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 11:58:57 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF32501.2070100@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290995089-sup-4112@think>

Hi, Chris

On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 20:55:28 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from Chris Mason's message of 2010-11-21 22:18:54 -0500:
>> Great, I'll test this and the others overnight.  Thanks!
>>
>> -chris
>>
>> Excerpts from Miao Xie's message of 2010-11-21 22:04:43 -0500:
>>> V1->V2 Changes:
>>> change the fix method. we split bios in btrfs_submit_direct() to fix this
>>> problem now.
>>>
>>> btrfs paniced when we write>64KB data by direct IO at one time.
>>>
>>> Reproduce steps:
>>>   # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda5 /dev/sda6
>>>   # mount /dev/sda5 /mnt
>>>   # dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/tmpfile bs=100K count=1 oflag=direct
>
> Thanks again for coding this up, the implementation looks good to me.
>
> This easily passed the basic tests, but I ran into trouble when I tried
> using it to server my virtual machines.  The problem is that we create
> ordered extents in the DIO get_blocks call, but the generic DIO code
> may create a single bio to span more than one ordered extent by merging
> adjacent ranges.  I've fixed it here by walking forward through the
> ordered extents in the end_io processing.
>
> I've pushed these changes out to the next-rc branch of the btrfs
> unstable tree, and the last commit is here:
>
> Could you please take a look and verify it still works with your tests?
>
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git;a=commit;h=163cf09c2a0ee5cac6285f9347975bd1e97725da

I have tested it, and It works well.

Thanks
Miao

>
> -chris
>


      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-29  3:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-22  3:04 [PATCH -V2 3/3] btrfs: fix panic caused by direct IO Miao Xie
2010-11-22  3:18 ` Chris Mason
2010-11-29  1:55   ` Chris Mason
2010-11-29  2:08     ` Miao Xie
2010-11-29  3:58     ` Miao Xie [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CF32501.2070100@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=josef@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).