* [PATCH] Btrfs: fix compile warning in fs/btrfs/inode.c
@ 2010-12-08 10:01 liubo
2010-12-08 23:59 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2010-12-09 1:08 ` liubo
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: liubo @ 2010-12-08 10:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Btrfs
While compiling btrfs, I got belows:
CC [M] fs/btrfs/inode.o
fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function =E2=80=98btrfs_end_dio_bio=E2=80=99:
fs/btrfs/inode.c:5720: warning: format =E2=80=98%lu=E2=80=99 expects ty=
pe =E2=80=98long unsigned int=E2=80=99, but argument 4 has type =E2=80=98=
sector_t=E2=80=99
LD [M] fs/btrfs/btrfs.o
Building modules, stage 2.
MODPOST 1 modules
LD [M] fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
This fixes the compile warning.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 0f34cae..eff5aef 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -5713,8 +5713,8 @@ static void btrfs_end_dio_bio(struct bio *bio, in=
t err)
if (err) {
printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs direct IO failed ino %lu rw %lu "
"disk_bytenr %lu len %u err no %d\n",
- dip->inode->i_ino, bio->bi_rw, bio->bi_sector,
- bio->bi_size, err);
+ dip->inode->i_ino, bio->bi_rw,
+ (unsigned long)bio->bi_sector, bio->bi_size, err);
dip->errors =3D 1;
=20
/*
--=20
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix compile warning in fs/btrfs/inode.c
2010-12-08 10:01 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix compile warning in fs/btrfs/inode.c liubo
@ 2010-12-08 23:59 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2010-12-09 1:08 ` liubo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tsutomu Itoh @ 2010-12-08 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: liubo; +Cc: Linux Btrfs
(2010/12/08 19:01), liubo wrote:
> While compiling btrfs, I got belows:
>=20
> CC [M] fs/btrfs/inode.o
> fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function =E2=80=98btrfs_end_dio_bio=E2=80=99:
> fs/btrfs/inode.c:5720: warning: format =E2=80=98%lu=E2=80=99 expects =
type =E2=80=98long unsigned int=E2=80=99, but argument 4 has type =E2=80=
=98sector_t=E2=80=99
> LD [M] fs/btrfs/btrfs.o
> Building modules, stage 2.
> MODPOST 1 modules
> LD [M] fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
>=20
> This fixes the compile warning.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 0f34cae..eff5aef 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -5713,8 +5713,8 @@ static void btrfs_end_dio_bio(struct bio *bio, =
int err)
> if (err) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs direct IO failed ino %lu rw %lu "
> "disk_bytenr %lu len %u err no %d\n",
> - dip->inode->i_ino, bio->bi_rw, bio->bi_sector,
> - bio->bi_size, err);
> + dip->inode->i_ino, bio->bi_rw,
> + (unsigned long)bio->bi_sector, bio->bi_size, err);
sector_t is defined by include/linux/types.h as follows.
#ifdef CONFIG_LBDAF
typedef u64 sector_t;
typedef u64 blkcnt_t;
#else
typedef unsigned long sector_t;
typedef unsigned long blkcnt_t;
#endif
Therefore, I think that you should change the code as follows.=20
=20
printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs direct IO failed ino %lu rw %lu "
"disk_bytenr %llu len %u err no %d\n",
dip->inode->i_ino, bio->bi_rw,
(u64)bio->bi_sector, bio->bi_size, err);
> dip->errors =3D 1;
> =20
> /*
Regards,
Itoh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix compile warning in fs/btrfs/inode.c
2010-12-08 10:01 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix compile warning in fs/btrfs/inode.c liubo
2010-12-08 23:59 ` Tsutomu Itoh
@ 2010-12-09 1:08 ` liubo
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: liubo @ 2010-12-09 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Btrfs
On 12/08/2010 06:01 PM, liubo wrote:
> While compiling btrfs, I got belows:
>=20
> CC [M] fs/btrfs/inode.o
> fs/btrfs/inode.c: In function =E2=80=98btrfs_end_dio_bio=E2=80=99:
> fs/btrfs/inode.c:5720: warning: format =E2=80=98%lu=E2=80=99 expects =
type =E2=80=98long unsigned int=E2=80=99, but argument 4 has type =E2=80=
=98sector_t=E2=80=99
> LD [M] fs/btrfs/btrfs.o
> Building modules, stage 2.
> MODPOST 1 modules
> LD [M] fs/btrfs/btrfs.ko
>=20
> This fixes the compile warning.
>=20
Sorry, plz ignore this.
Have seen someone post patch to fix this.
thanks,
Liu Bo
> Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>=20
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index 0f34cae..eff5aef 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -5713,8 +5713,8 @@ static void btrfs_end_dio_bio(struct bio *bio, =
int err)
> if (err) {
> printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs direct IO failed ino %lu rw %lu "
> "disk_bytenr %lu len %u err no %d\n",
> - dip->inode->i_ino, bio->bi_rw, bio->bi_sector,
> - bio->bi_size, err);
> + dip->inode->i_ino, bio->bi_rw,
> + (unsigned long)bio->bi_sector, bio->bi_size, err);
> dip->errors =3D 1;
> =20
> /*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" =
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-12-09 1:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-08 10:01 [PATCH] Btrfs: fix compile warning in fs/btrfs/inode.c liubo
2010-12-08 23:59 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2010-12-09 1:08 ` liubo
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).