linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: liubo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: forced readonly mounts on errors
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:06:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D34F597.9020304@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1295293927-sup-5879@think>

On 01/18/2011 03:56 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
> Excerpts from liubo's message of 2011-01-06 06:30:25 -0500:
>> This patch comes from "Forced readonly mounts on errors" ideas.
>>
>> As we know, this is the first step in being more fault tolerant of disk
>> corruptions instead of just using BUG() statements.
>>
>> The major content:
>> - add a framework for generating errors that should result in filesystems
>>   going readonly.
>> - keep FS state in disk super block.
>> - make sure that all of resource will be freed and released at umount time.
>> - make sure that after FS is forced readonly on error, there will be no more
>>   disk change before FS is corrected. For this, we should stop write operation.
>>
>> After this patch is applied, the conversion from BUG() to such a framework can
>> happen incrementally.
> 
> I think this is a good overall framework and it will meet our needs
> nicely as we scale up the error handling in the filesystem.
> 
> One concern I have is where we save the error state to disk:
> 
>> +static void __save_error_info(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>> +{
>> +    struct btrfs_super_block *disk_super = &fs_info->super_copy;
>> +
>> +    fs_info->fs_state = BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_ERROR;
>> +    disk_super->flags |= cpu_to_le64(BTRFS_SUPER_FLAG_ERROR);
>> +
>> +    mutex_lock(&fs_info->trans_mutex);
>> +    memcpy(&fs_info->super_for_commit, disk_super,
>> +           sizeof(fs_info->super_for_commit));
>> +    mutex_unlock(&fs_info->trans_mutex);
> 
> The super_for_commit isn't changed until we have a fully consistent set
> of fields in the super block.  The super_copy is changed as the
> transaction progresses.
> 
> So, this memcpy isn't quite safe.  We should simply set the flag on the
> super_for_commit and the super_copy individually.
> 

Got it, thanks for pointing it out.

> I'll make this change and pull it in.  We can build from here.
> 

Great!

thanks,
Liubo

> -chris
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2011-01-18  2:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <4D24160C.6070900@cn.fujitsu.com>
     [not found] ` <4D252E42.5060803@cn.fujitsu.com>
     [not found]   ` <4D258BC7.8040105@cn.fujitsu.com>
2011-01-06 11:30     ` [PATCH] Btrfs: forced readonly mounts on errors liubo
2011-01-17 19:56       ` Chris Mason
2011-01-18  2:06         ` liubo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D34F597.9020304@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).