linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Brian J. Murrell" <brian@interlinx.bc.ca>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: efficiency of btrfs cow
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 11:17:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D73B389.1010803@interlinx.bc.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1299427596.15017.8.camel@ayu>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1514 bytes --]

On 11-03-06 11:06 AM, Calvin Walton wrote:
> 
> There actually is such a periodic jump in overhead,

Ahh.  So my instincts were correct.

> caused by the way
> which btrfs dynamically allocates space for metadata as needed by the
> creation of new files, which it does whenever the free metadata space
> ratio reaches a threshold (it's probably more complicated than that, but
> close enough for now).

Sounds fair enough.

> To see exactly what's going on, you should use the "btrfs filesystem df"
> command to see how space is being allocated for data and metadata
> separately:
> 
> ayu ~ # btrfs fi df /
> Data: total=266.01GB, used=249.35GB
> System, DUP: total=8.00MB, used=36.00KB
> Metadata, DUP: total=3.62GB, used=1.93GB
> ayu ~ # df -h /
> Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda4             402G  254G  145G  64% /
> 
> If you use the btrfs tool's df command to account for space in your
> testing, you should get much more accurate results.

Indeed!  Unfortunately that tool seems to be completely silent on my system:

# btrfs filesystem df /mnt/btrfs-test/
# btrfs filesystem df /mnt/btrfs-test

Where /mnt/btrfs-test is where I have the device that I created the
btrfs filesystem on mounted.  i.e.:

# grep btrfs /proc/mounts
/dev/mapper/btrfs--test-btrfs--test /mnt/btrfs-test btrfs rw,relatime 0 0

My btrfs-tools appears to be from 20101101.  The changelog says:

  * Merging upstream version 0.19+20101101.

Cheers,
b.


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-06 16:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-06 15:46 efficiency of btrfs cow Brian J. Murrell
2011-03-06 16:02 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2011-03-06 16:11   ` Brian J. Murrell
2011-03-06 16:17   ` Calvin Walton
2011-03-06 16:18     ` Brian J. Murrell
2011-03-06 17:22   ` Freddie Cash
2011-03-06 16:06 ` Calvin Walton
2011-03-06 16:17   ` Brian J. Murrell [this message]
2011-03-23 12:39   ` Brian J. Murrell
2011-03-23 15:53     ` Chester
2011-03-23 16:19       ` Brian J. Murrell
2011-03-23 17:36     ` Kolja Dummann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D73B389.1010803@interlinx.bc.ca \
    --to=brian@interlinx.bc.ca \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).