From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Brian J. Murrell" Subject: Re: btrfs fi df returns nothing Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 07:20:24 -0500 Message-ID: <4D777088.8040509@interlinx.bc.ca> References: <20110309114746.GA2998@carfax.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAF970DE580BF850813C453D1" To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110309114746.GA2998@carfax.org.uk> List-ID: This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAF970DE580BF850813C453D1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11-03-09 06:47 AM, Hugo Mills wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 06:20:28AM -0500, Brian J. Murrell wrote: >=20 > Ouch. That's a *very* early kernel, in btrfs terms. Yeah, that's my understanding also. > There are a > significant number of serious bugs that have been fixed since then. Bugs in btrfs or other related kernel bugs? > There's Ubuntu kernel PPAs listed on the btrfs wiki: > https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Getting_started#Ubuntu_Linux Indeed. I was hoping to not upgrade a whole kernel to the current development kernel but instead just update btrfs to as new as I can get with a 2.6.32 kernel. Just trying to keep the ripple effect to a minimum= =2E > The wiki is your friend. :) Indeed. b. --------------enigAF970DE580BF850813C453D1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk13cIgACgkQl3EQlGLyuXAGCwCdEP6FrwOddo5QiFXjvsUGz8xJ FzsAoLi019J7oEuao/2ddIXXJIX9qKS2 =Bmnw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAF970DE580BF850813C453D1--