linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
To: chris.mason@oracle.com, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dave@jikos.cz
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/6] btrfs: sync scrub with commit & device removal
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 13:58:52 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D8B400C.7010102@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110323172811.GH17108@twin.jikos.cz>

On 23.03.2011 18:28, David Sterba wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> you are adding a new smp_mb, can you please explain why it's needed and
> document it?
> 
> thanks,
> dave
> 
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 04:55:07PM +0100, Arne Jansen wrote:
>> This adds several synchronizations:
>>  - for a transaction commit, the scrub gets paused before the
>>    tree roots are committed until the super are safely on disk
>>  - during a log commit, scrubbing of supers is disabled
>>  - on unmount, the scrub gets cancelled
>>  - on device removal, the scrub for the particular device gets cancelled
>>

>> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
>> @@ -1330,6 +1330,8 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char *device_path)
>>  		goto error_undo;
>>  
>>  	device->in_fs_metadata = 0;
>> +	smp_mb();
>         ^^^^^^^^

The idea was to disallow any new scrubs so start beyond
this point, but it turns out this is not strong enough.
I have to move the check for in_fs_metadata in btrfs_scrub_dev
inside the scrub_lock. In this case, the smp_mb is still needed,
as in_fs_metadata is not protected by any lock. I'll add a
comment.
Thanks for forcing me to rethink this :)

-Arne

> 
>> +	btrfs_scrub_cancel_dev(root, device);
>>  
>>  	/*
>>  	 * the device list mutex makes sure that we don't change



  reply	other threads:[~2011-03-24 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-18 15:55 [PATCH v4 0/6] btrfs: scrub Arne Jansen
2011-03-18 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] btrfs: add parameter to btrfs_lookup_csum_range Arne Jansen
2011-03-18 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] btrfs: make struct map_lookup public Arne Jansen
2011-03-18 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] btrfs: add scrub code and prototypes Arne Jansen
2011-03-23 17:18   ` David Sterba
2011-03-24 10:25     ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-24 14:30       ` David Sterba
2011-03-18 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] btrfs: sync scrub with commit & device removal Arne Jansen
2011-03-23 17:28   ` David Sterba
2011-03-24 12:58     ` Arne Jansen [this message]
2011-03-24 13:48       ` Arne Jansen
2011-03-18 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] btrfs: add state information for scrub Arne Jansen
2011-03-18 15:55 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] btrfs: new ioctls " Arne Jansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D8B400C.7010102@gmx.net \
    --to=sensille@gmx.net \
    --cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
    --cc=dave@jikos.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).