From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, chris.mason@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] btrfs: Balance progress monitoring
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2011 10:26:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D9E7249.60303@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302195975-3088-2-git-send-email-hugo@carfax.org.uk>
01:06, Hugo Mills wrote:
> This patch introduces a basic form of progress monitoring for balance
> operations, by counting the number of block groups remaining. The
> information is exposed to userspace by an ioctl.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 9 +++++++
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 2 +
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.h | 7 ++++++
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 5 files changed, 111 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> index 7f78cc7..6c5526c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
> @@ -865,6 +865,11 @@ struct btrfs_block_group_cache {
> struct list_head cluster_list;
> };
>
> +struct btrfs_balance_info {
> + u64 expected;
> + u64 completed;
> +};
> +
Those can be u32.
And how about also count the total size and used size of all the chunks ?
> struct reloc_control;
> struct btrfs_device;
> struct btrfs_fs_devices;
> @@ -1078,6 +1083,10 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
>
> /* filesystem state */
> u64 fs_state;
> +
> + /* Keep track of any rebalance operations on this FS */
> + spinlock_t balance_info_lock;
> + struct btrfs_balance_info *balance_info;
> };
>
> /*
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> index 100b07f..3d690de 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
> @@ -1645,6 +1645,7 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
> spin_lock_init(&fs_info->ref_cache_lock);
> spin_lock_init(&fs_info->fs_roots_radix_lock);
> spin_lock_init(&fs_info->delayed_iput_lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&fs_info->balance_info_lock);
>
> init_completion(&fs_info->kobj_unregister);
> fs_info->tree_root = tree_root;
> @@ -1670,6 +1671,7 @@ struct btrfs_root *open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
> fs_info->sb = sb;
> fs_info->max_inline = 8192 * 1024;
> fs_info->metadata_ratio = 0;
> + fs_info->balance_info = NULL;
>
> fs_info->thread_pool_size = min_t(unsigned long,
> num_online_cpus() + 2, 8);
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 5fdb2ab..a8fbb07 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -2375,6 +2375,38 @@ static noinline long btrfs_ioctl_wait_sync(struct file *file, void __user *argp)
> return btrfs_wait_for_commit(root, transid);
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Return the current status of any balance operation
> + */
> +long btrfs_ioctl_balance_progress(
> + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_balance_progress __user *user_dest)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_balance_progress dest;
> +
> + spin_lock(&fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + if (!fs_info->balance_info) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> + dest.expected = fs_info->balance_info->expected;
> + dest.completed = fs_info->balance_info->completed;
> +
> + spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> +
> + if (copy_to_user(user_dest, &dest,
> + sizeof(struct btrfs_ioctl_balance_progress)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +error:
> + spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
> cmd, unsigned long arg)
> {
> @@ -2414,6 +2446,8 @@ long btrfs_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int
> return btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(root, argp);
> case BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE:
> return btrfs_balance(root->fs_info->dev_root);
> + case BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE_PROGRESS:
> + return btrfs_ioctl_balance_progress(root->fs_info, argp);
> case BTRFS_IOC_CLONE:
> return btrfs_ioctl_clone(file, arg, 0, 0, 0);
> case BTRFS_IOC_CLONE_RANGE:
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
> index 8fb3821..4c82d40 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.h
> @@ -157,6 +157,11 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args {
> struct btrfs_ioctl_space_info spaces[0];
> };
>
> +struct btrfs_ioctl_balance_progress {
> + __u64 expected;
> + __u64 completed;
> +};
> +
> #define BTRFS_IOC_SNAP_CREATE _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 1, \
> struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args)
> #define BTRFS_IOC_DEFRAG _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 2, \
> @@ -203,4 +208,6 @@ struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args {
> struct btrfs_ioctl_vol_args_v2)
> #define BTRFS_IOC_SUBVOL_GETFLAGS _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 25, __u64)
> #define BTRFS_IOC_SUBVOL_SETFLAGS _IOW(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 26, __u64)
> +#define BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE_PROGRESS _IOR(BTRFS_IOCTL_MAGIC, 27, \
> + struct btrfs_ioctl_balance_progress)
> #endif
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index dd13eb8..2bd4565 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -2041,6 +2041,7 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
> struct btrfs_root *chunk_root = dev_root->fs_info->chunk_root;
> struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans;
> struct btrfs_key found_key;
> + struct btrfs_balance_info *bal_info;
>
> if (dev_root->fs_info->sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)
> return -EROFS;
> @@ -2051,6 +2052,20 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
> mutex_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
> dev_root = dev_root->fs_info->dev_root;
>
> + bal_info = kmalloc(
> + sizeof(struct btrfs_balance_info),
> + GFP_NOFS);
> + if (!bal_info) {
> + ret = -ENOSPC;
> + goto error_no_status;
> + }
> + spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + dev_root->fs_info->balance_info = bal_info;
> + bal_info->expected = -1; /* One less than actually counted,
> + because chunk 0 is special */
> + bal_info->completed = 0;
> + spin_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> +
> /* step one make some room on all the devices */
> list_for_each_entry(device, devices, dev_list) {
> old_size = device->total_bytes;
> @@ -2074,10 +2089,42 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
> btrfs_end_transaction(trans, dev_root);
> }
>
> - /* step two, relocate all the chunks */
> + /* step two, count the chunks */
> path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> - BUG_ON(!path);
> + if (!path) {
> + ret = -ENOSPC;
> + goto error;
> + }
> +
> + key.objectid = BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID;
> + key.offset = (u64)-1;
> + key.type = BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY;
> +
> + ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, chunk_root, &key, path, 0, 0);
> + if (ret <= 0) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: Failed to find the last chunk.\n");
> + BUG();
> + }
> +
How about record the chunk count when allocating a chunk, and clear
the count before balancing? In this way we can avoid reading the
chunk tree.
> + while (1) {
> + ret = btrfs_previous_item(chunk_root, path, 0,
> + BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> +
> + spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + bal_info->expected++;
> + spin_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + }
> +
> + btrfs_free_path(path);
> + path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> + if (!path) {
> + ret = -ENOSPC;
> + goto error;
> + }
>
> + /* step three, relocate all the chunks */
> key.objectid = BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID;
> key.offset = (u64)-1;
> key.type = BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY;
> @@ -2115,10 +2162,20 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
> found_key.offset);
> BUG_ON(ret && ret != -ENOSPC);
> key.offset = found_key.offset - 1;
> + spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + bal_info->completed++;
> + spin_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + printk(KERN_INFO "btrfs: balance: %llu/%llu block groups completed\n",
> + bal_info->completed, bal_info->expected);
> }
> ret = 0;
> error:
> btrfs_free_path(path);
> + spin_lock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> + kfree(dev_root->fs_info->balance_info);
> + dev_root->fs_info->balance_info = NULL;
> + spin_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->balance_info_lock);
> +error_no_status:
> mutex_unlock(&dev_root->fs_info->volume_mutex);
> return ret;
> }
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-08 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-07 17:06 [PATCH v4 0/8] Balance management Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] btrfs: Balance progress monitoring Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:26 ` Josef Bacik
2011-04-08 2:26 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2011-04-08 13:43 ` Hugo Mills
2011-04-08 13:12 ` David Sterba
2011-04-08 16:00 ` David Sterba
2011-04-08 13:37 ` David Sterba
2011-04-08 14:07 ` Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 2/8] btrfs: Cancel filesystem balance Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] btrfs: Factor out enumeration of chunks to a separate function Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 18:00 ` Josef Bacik
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] btrfs: Implement filtered balance ioctl Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] btrfs: Balance filter for device ID Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] btrfs: Balance filter for virtual address ranges Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] btrfs: Replication-type information Hugo Mills
2011-04-07 17:06 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] btrfs: Balance filter for physical device address Hugo Mills
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D9E7249.60303@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=hugo@carfax.org.uk \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).