From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Li Zefan Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix memory leaks in btrfs_new_inode() Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:23:05 +0800 Message-ID: <4DA26609.5060000@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1302316207-30806-1-git-send-email-yoshinori.sano@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, chris.mason@oracle.com To: Yoshinori Sano Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1302316207-30806-1-git-send-email-yoshinori.sano@gmail.com> List-ID: Yoshinori Sano wrote: > This patch fixes memory leaks in btrfs_new_inode(). > > Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sano > --- > fs/btrfs/inode.c | 5 ++++- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > index aa116dc..d8c93c1 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c > @@ -4536,14 +4536,17 @@ static struct inode *btrfs_new_inode(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > > inode = new_inode(root->fs_info->sb); > - if (!inode) > + if (!inode) { > + btrfs_free_path(path); > return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + } > > if (dir) { > trace_btrfs_inode_request(dir); > > ret = btrfs_set_inode_index(dir, index); > if (ret) { > + btrfs_free_path(path); > iput(inode); > return ERR_PTR(ret); > } It would be better to avoid multiple returns here: fail_free_path: btrfs_free_path(path); fail_put_inode: iput(inode); fail: ...