From: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
To: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: don't reserve metadata when we're using the delalloc reserve
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 18:34:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4DA5D081.4070108@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1302710775-29602-1-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com>
On 13.04.2011 18:06, Josef Bacik wrote:
> There are a bunch of places where we do btrfs_join_transaction(root, 1), but
> really we set the block_rsv to the delalloc reserve because our metadata was
> reserved at delalloc time. This means we don't need to reserve space at all,
> and can just join the transaction and go. This patch also fixes a few places
> where we weren't actually setting the block_rsv to the delalloc reserve.
> Thanks,
>
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> index c4b914e..e9bda50 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
> @@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ again:
> }
> }
> if (start == 0) {
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 1);
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 0);
btrfs_join_transaction ignores the num_blocks parameter, so this
shouldn't change anything. Maybe it's cleaner to just eradicate
the parameter.
-Arne
> BUG_ON(IS_ERR(trans));
> btrfs_set_trans_block_group(trans, inode);
> trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->delalloc_block_rsv;
> @@ -617,8 +617,9 @@ retry:
> async_extent->start + async_extent->ram_size - 1,
> GFP_NOFS);
>
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 1);
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 0);
> BUG_ON(IS_ERR(trans));
> + trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->delalloc_block_rsv;
> ret = btrfs_reserve_extent(trans, root,
> async_extent->compressed_size,
> async_extent->compressed_size,
> @@ -778,7 +779,12 @@ static noinline int cow_file_range(struct inode *inode,
> int ret = 0;
>
> BUG_ON(root == root->fs_info->tree_root);
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 1);
> +
> + /*
> + * Our metadata reservations should have been taken care of in the
> + * delalloc stuff, so we don't need to reserve space here.
> + */
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 0);
> BUG_ON(IS_ERR(trans));
> btrfs_set_trans_block_group(trans, inode);
> trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->delalloc_block_rsv;
> @@ -1054,11 +1060,12 @@ static noinline int run_delalloc_nocow(struct inode *inode,
> BUG_ON(!path);
> if (root == root->fs_info->tree_root) {
> nolock = true;
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(root, 1);
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(root, 0);
> } else {
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 1);
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 0);
> }
> BUG_ON(IS_ERR(trans));
> + trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->delalloc_block_rsv;
>
> cow_start = (u64)-1;
> cur_offset = start;
> @@ -1715,9 +1722,9 @@ static int btrfs_finish_ordered_io(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end)
> ret = btrfs_ordered_update_i_size(inode, 0, ordered_extent);
> if (!ret) {
> if (nolock)
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(root, 1);
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(root, 0);
> else
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 1);
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 0);
> BUG_ON(IS_ERR(trans));
> btrfs_set_trans_block_group(trans, inode);
> trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->delalloc_block_rsv;
> @@ -1732,9 +1739,9 @@ static int btrfs_finish_ordered_io(struct inode *inode, u64 start, u64 end)
> 0, &cached_state, GFP_NOFS);
>
> if (nolock)
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(root, 1);
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction_nolock(root, 0);
> else
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 1);
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 0);
> BUG_ON(IS_ERR(trans));
> btrfs_set_trans_block_group(trans, inode);
> trans->block_rsv = &root->fs_info->delalloc_block_rsv;
> @@ -5839,7 +5846,7 @@ again:
>
> BUG_ON(!ordered);
>
> - trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 1);
> + trans = btrfs_join_transaction(root, 0);
> if (IS_ERR(trans)) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-13 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-13 16:06 [PATCH] Btrfs: don't reserve metadata when we're using the delalloc reserve Josef Bacik
2011-04-13 16:34 ` Arne Jansen [this message]
2011-04-13 16:41 ` Josef Bacik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4DA5D081.4070108@gmx.net \
--to=sensille@gmx.net \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).