From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][BTRFS-PROG] Avoid to scan cdrom and floppy
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:00:33 -0400
Message-ID: <4DFA1A91.5020406@redhat.com>
References: <Bn+ojsGi1uB@helmut.hullen.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: Helmut Hullen <Hullen@t-online.de>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
To: helmut@hullen.de
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Bn+ojsGi1uB@helmut.hullen.de>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 06/16/2011 10:45 AM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> Hallo, Josef,
> 
> Du meintest am 16.06.11:
> 
>>> Thank you - it's nice for all who don't use udev.
> 
>> Who the hell doesn't use udev?
> 
> Me - p.e.
> "udev" may be interesting for desktop users, for multimedia computers.  
> It's not necessary for a simple server, for a machine where the  
> administrator wants to rule instead of "udev".
> 
> If the developers of "btrfs" really do mean that "udev" has to run on  
> the machine which uses "btrfs" then they have to say so, and they have  
> to check wether this (possible) condition is redeemed.
> 
> Not only in the "devices" environment.
> 

You don't need udev to use btrfs, I've just not seen a distro that
allows you to not run with udev, so my question is more curiosity than
anything.  Thanks,

Josef