From: liubo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dave@jikos.cz, chris.mason@oracle.com, josef@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v4] Btrfs: improve write ahead log with sub transaction
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 17:27:47 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E0C4193.203@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1309419392-17770-1-git-send-email-liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
On 06/30/2011 03:36 PM, Liu Bo wrote:
> I've been working to try to improve the write-ahead log's performance,
> and I found that the bottleneck addresses in the checksum items,
> especially when we want to make a random write on a large file, e.g a 4G file.
>
> Then a idea for this suggested by Chris is to use sub transaction ids and just
> to log the part of inode that had changed since either the last log commit or
> the last transaction commit. And as we also push the sub transid into the btree
> blocks, we'll get much faster tree walks. As a result, we abandon the original
> brute force approach, which is "to delete all items of the inode in log",
> to making sure we get the most uptodate copies of everything, and instead
> we manage to "find and merge", i.e. finding extents in the log tree and merging
> in the new extents from the file.
>
> This patchset puts the above idea into code, and although the code is now more
> complex, it brings us a great deal of performance improvement:
>
This is also available in
git://repo.or.cz/linux-btrfs-devel.git sub-trans
thanks,
liubo
> in my sysbench "write + fsync" test:
>
> 451.01Kb/sec -> 4.3621Mb/sec
>
> Also, I've run the "synctest", and it works well with both directory and file.
>
> v1->v2, rebase.
> v2->v3, thanks to Chris, we worked together to solve 2 bugs, and after that it
> worked as expected.
> v3->v4, thanks to Josef, we simplify several codes.
>
> Liu Bo (12):
> Btrfs: introduce sub transaction stuff
> Btrfs: update block generation if should_cow_block fails
> Btrfs: modify btrfs_drop_extents API
> Btrfs: introduce first sub trans
> Btrfs: still update inode trans stuff when size remains unchanged
> Btrfs: improve log with sub transaction
> Btrfs: add checksum check for log
> Btrfs: fix a bug of log check
> Btrfs: kick off useless code
> Btrfs: use the right generation number to read log_root_tree
> Btrfs: do not iput inode when inode is still in log
> Revert "Btrfs: do not flush csum items of unchanged file data during
> treelog"
>
> fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h | 12 ++-
> fs/btrfs/ctree.c | 69 +++++++++++----
> fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 5 +-
> fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 12 ++--
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 10 ++-
> fs/btrfs/file.c | 22 ++---
> fs/btrfs/inode.c | 39 ++++++---
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 6 +-
> fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 6 +-
> fs/btrfs/transaction.c | 13 ++-
> fs/btrfs/transaction.h | 19 ++++-
> fs/btrfs/tree-defrag.c | 2 +-
> fs/btrfs/tree-log.c | 225 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 13 files changed, 293 insertions(+), 147 deletions(-)
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-30 9:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-30 7:36 [GIT PULL v4] Btrfs: improve write ahead log with sub transaction Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 01/12] Btrfs: introduce sub transaction stuff Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 02/12] Btrfs: update block generation if should_cow_block fails Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 03/12] Btrfs: modify btrfs_drop_extents API Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 04/12] Btrfs: introduce first sub trans Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 05/12] Btrfs: still update inode trans stuff when size remains unchanged Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 06/12] Btrfs: improve log with sub transaction Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 07/12] Btrfs: add checksum check for log Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 08/12] Btrfs: fix a bug of log check Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 09/12] Btrfs: kick off useless code Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 10/12] Btrfs: use the right generation number to read log_root_tree Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 11/12] Btrfs: do not iput inode when inode is still in log Liu Bo
2011-06-30 7:36 ` [PATCH 12/12] Revert "Btrfs: do not flush csum items of unchanged file data during treelog" Liu Bo
2011-06-30 9:27 ` liubo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E0C4193.203@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=dave@jikos.cz \
--cc=josef@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).