From: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Linux Btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Btrfs: fix BUG_ON() caused by ENOSPC when relocating space
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2011 18:34:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E2017BC.8060903@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
When we balanced the chunks across the devices, BUG_ON() in
__finish_chunk_alloc() was triggered.
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2568!
[SNIP]
Call Trace:
[<ffffffffa049525e>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x8e/0xa0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa04546b0>] do_chunk_alloc+0x330/0x3a0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045c654>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb4/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045c86b>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xdb/0x350 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa048a8d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa04476fd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x14d/0x5e0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa044660d>] ? read_block_for_search+0x14d/0x4d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0447c9b>] btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x240 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa044dd5e>] btrfs_search_slot+0x49e/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa044f07d>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x8d/0xf0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045e973>] insert_with_overflow+0x43/0x110 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa045eb0d>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0xcd/0x1f0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0489bd0>] ? map_extent_buffer+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff812276ad>] ? rb_insert_color+0x9d/0x160
[<ffffffffa046cc40>] ? inode_tree_add+0xf0/0x150 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0474801>] btrfs_add_link+0xc1/0x1c0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811dacac>] ? security_inode_init_security+0x1c/0x30
[<ffffffffa04a28aa>] ? btrfs_init_acl+0x4a/0x180 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa047492f>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x2f/0x70 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa046af16>] ? btrfs_init_inode_security+0x46/0x60 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa0474ac0>] btrfs_create+0x150/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81159c63>] ? generic_permission+0x23/0xb0
[<ffffffff8115b415>] vfs_create+0xa5/0xc0
[<ffffffff8115ce6e>] do_last+0x5fe/0x880
[<ffffffff8115dc0d>] path_openat+0xcd/0x3d0
[<ffffffff8115e029>] do_filp_open+0x49/0xa0
[<ffffffff8116a965>] ? alloc_fd+0x95/0x160
[<ffffffff8114f0c7>] do_sys_open+0x107/0x1e0
[<ffffffff810bcc3f>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1bf/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8114f1e0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
[<ffffffff81484ec2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[SNIP]
RIP [<ffffffffa049444a>] __finish_chunk_alloc+0x20a/0x220 [btrfs]
The reason is:
Task1 Space balance task
do_chunk_alloc()
__finish_chunk_alloc()
update device info
in the chunk tree
alloc system metadata block
relocate system metadata block group
set system metadata block group
readonly, This block group is the
only one that can allocate space. So
there is no free space that can be
allocated now.
find no space and don't try
to alloc new chunk, and then
return ENOSPC
BUG_ON() in __finish_chunk_alloc()
was triggered.
Fix this bug by allocating a new system metadata chunk before relocating the
old one if we find there is no free space which can be allocated after setting
the old block group to be read-only.
Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
index 71cd456..00c8a1a 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
@@ -6524,15 +6524,28 @@ static u64 update_block_group_flags(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 flags)
return flags;
}
-static int set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)
+static int set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache, int force)
{
struct btrfs_space_info *sinfo = cache->space_info;
u64 num_bytes;
+ u64 min_allocable_bytes;
int ret = -ENOSPC;
if (cache->ro)
return 0;
+ /*
+ * We need some metadata space and system metadata space for
+ * allocating chunks in some corner cases until we force to set
+ * it to be readonly.
+ */
+ if ((sinfo->flags &
+ (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA)) &&
+ !force)
+ min_allocable_bytes = 1 * 1024 * 1024;
+ else
+ min_allocable_bytes = 0;
+
spin_lock(&sinfo->lock);
spin_lock(&cache->lock);
num_bytes = cache->key.offset - cache->reserved - cache->pinned -
@@ -6540,7 +6553,8 @@ static int set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_block_group_cache *cache)
if (sinfo->bytes_used + sinfo->bytes_reserved + sinfo->bytes_pinned +
sinfo->bytes_may_use + sinfo->bytes_readonly +
- cache->reserved_pinned + num_bytes <= sinfo->total_bytes) {
+ cache->reserved_pinned + num_bytes + min_allocable_bytes <=
+ sinfo->total_bytes) {
sinfo->bytes_readonly += num_bytes;
sinfo->bytes_reserved += cache->reserved_pinned;
cache->reserved_pinned = 0;
@@ -6571,7 +6585,7 @@ int btrfs_set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_root *root,
do_chunk_alloc(trans, root, 2 * 1024 * 1024, alloc_flags,
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
- ret = set_block_group_ro(cache);
+ ret = set_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
if (!ret)
goto out;
alloc_flags = get_alloc_profile(root, cache->space_info->flags);
@@ -6579,7 +6593,7 @@ int btrfs_set_block_group_ro(struct btrfs_root *root,
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE);
if (ret < 0)
goto out;
- ret = set_block_group_ro(cache);
+ ret = set_block_group_ro(cache, 0);
out:
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
return ret;
@@ -7016,7 +7030,7 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_root *root)
set_avail_alloc_bits(root->fs_info, cache->flags);
if (btrfs_chunk_readonly(root, cache->key.objectid))
- set_block_group_ro(cache);
+ set_block_group_ro(cache, 1);
}
list_for_each_entry_rcu(space_info, &root->fs_info->space_info, list) {
@@ -7030,9 +7044,9 @@ int btrfs_read_block_groups(struct btrfs_root *root)
* mirrored block groups.
*/
list_for_each_entry(cache, &space_info->block_groups[3], list)
- set_block_group_ro(cache);
+ set_block_group_ro(cache, 1);
list_for_each_entry(cache, &space_info->block_groups[4], list)
- set_block_group_ro(cache);
+ set_block_group_ro(cache, 1);
}
init_global_block_rsv(info);
--
1.7.4
reply other threads:[~2011-07-15 10:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E2017BC.8060903@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=miaox@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).