From: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, chris.mason@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 09:56:00 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E28CAA0.2070801@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1311277713-7747-7-git-send-email-mfasheh@suse.com>
(2011/07/22 4:48), Mark Fasheh wrote:
> I also removed the BUG_ON from error return of find_next_chunk in
> init_first_rw_device(). It turns out that the only caller of
> init_first_rw_device() also BUGS on any nonzero return so no actual behavior
> change has occurred here.
>
> do_chunk_alloc() also needed an update since it calls btrfs_alloc_chunk()
> which can now return -ENOMEM. Instead of setting space_info->full on any
> error from btrfs_alloc_chunk() I catch and return every error value _except_
> -ENOSPC. Thanks goes to Tsutomu Itoh for pointing that issue out.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 3 +++
> fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 6 ++++--
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> index aa91773..ff339b2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c
> @@ -3277,6 +3277,9 @@ again:
> }
>
> ret = btrfs_alloc_chunk(trans, extent_root, flags);
> + if (ret < 0 && ret != -ENOSPC)
> + return ret;
> +
You need mutex_unlock() before return.
Thanks,
Tsutomu
> spin_lock(&space_info->lock);
> if (ret)
> space_info->full = 1;
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> index 530a2fc..90d956c 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> @@ -1037,7 +1037,8 @@ static noinline int find_next_chunk(struct btrfs_root *root,
> struct btrfs_key found_key;
>
> path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> - BUG_ON(!path);
> + if (!path)
> + return -ENOMEM;
>
> key.objectid = objectid;
> key.offset = (u64)-1;
> @@ -2663,7 +2664,8 @@ static noinline int init_first_rw_device(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>
> ret = find_next_chunk(fs_info->chunk_root,
> BTRFS_FIRST_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID, &chunk_offset);
> - BUG_ON(ret);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> alloc_profile = BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA |
> (fs_info->metadata_alloc_profile &
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-22 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-21 19:48 [PATCH 0/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path errors v2 Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path() errors Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in replay_one_buffer() Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_truncate_inode_items Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_read_locked_inode Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_balance() Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk Mark Fasheh
2011-07-21 19:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON allocation errors in btrfs_drop_snapshot Mark Fasheh
2011-07-22 0:45 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-07-25 21:10 ` Mark Fasheh
2011-07-26 13:14 ` Justin Ossevoort
2011-07-22 0:56 ` Tsutomu Itoh [this message]
2011-07-25 21:37 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk Mark Fasheh
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-07-14 22:14 [PATCH 0/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path errors Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] btrfs: don't BUG_ON btrfs_alloc_path() errors Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in replay_one_buffer() Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_truncate_inode_items Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:14 ` [PATCH 4/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_read_locked_inode Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:15 ` [PATCH 5/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in btrfs_balance() Mark Fasheh
2011-07-14 22:15 ` [PATCH 6/7] btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk Mark Fasheh
2011-07-15 2:43 ` Tsutomu Itoh
2011-07-18 21:36 ` Mark Fasheh
2011-07-18 23:12 ` Chris Mason
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E28CAA0.2070801@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mfasheh@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).