From: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
To: "Matthias G. Eckermann" <mge@suse.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] btrfs auto snapshot
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2011 18:07:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E4CE450.2000303@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110817133108.GA24578@suse.com>
Thanks MgE. snapper is cool, does most the stuff required here.
however the challenging part will be to keep the number of tools
(to manage btrfs) at a limit 1 or 2 max. (too many tools to manage
btrfs is most likely to confuse).
Cheers, Anand
On 08/17/2011 09:31 PM, Matthias G. Eckermann wrote:
> Hello Anand and all,
>
> On 2011-08-17 T 10:15 +0800 Anand Jain wrote:
>
>> Appears that no one is working on the auto-snapshot feature for
>> btrfs, so here I am implementing the same.
>
> thanks for bringing this up! The group of features you are listing is
> indeed of high interest for people using btrfs.
>
> That said, not only have other people though about this, but a lot of
> your question already have been implemented in "snapper", and open
> source infrastructure developed as part of openSUSE and SUSE Linux
> Enterprise.
>
> Please see:
> http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Snapper
> http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Snapper_install
> http://lizards.opensuse.org/2011/04/01/introducing-snapper/
>
> Source code is here:
> http://gitorious.org/opensuse/snapper
>
> "snapper" will be part of openSUSE 12.1 and SUSE Linux Enterprise 11
> Service Pack 2, and is available as part of the respective Beta
> releases and Milestones already.
>
> snapper's concept in short:
> - shared library to make the functionality available to
> other tools as well
> - libsnapper is implemented on top of the btrfsprogs
> - cmdline tool "snapper"
> - global configuration file
> /etc/sysconfig/snapper
> - one configuration file per subvolume to be snapshotted
> /etc/snapper/configs/<config-name>
> I call this a "single configuration" going forward.
> Here also policies for time based snapshotting and
> cleanup are to be configured.
> - Integration into SUSE's management framework (YaST2/zypper),
> however, "snapper" should work independent of those,
> i.e. usable on other distributions easily.
>
>> Below is a draft on the feature list. Any comments / questions /
>> suggestions are welcome, please do let me know.
>
> Let me go through the single features quickly and list the matching
> snapper functionality.
>
>> btrfs auto snapshot feature will include:
>> Initially:
>> - configurable timely snapshots
>
> Yes. Configured per single configuration
>
>> - uses services and crontab to schedule
>
> Yes.
>
>> - Gnome integration
>
> I more see a need for integration into systems management frameworks.
>
>> - snapshot rollback and cleanups
>
> Yes. Rules for cleanups (time based, number of snapshots)
> per single configuration.
>
>> - snapshot trashing based on available space
>
> // not yet done.
>
>> - snapshot destination will be subvol/.btrfs/snapshot@<time> and
>
> snapshot destination is "/.snapshots/<number>/",
>
>> snapshot/.btrfs/snapshot@<time> for subvolume and snapshot
>> respectively
>
> Timestamp and Description of a snapshot are stored in a small XML
> file /.snapshots/<number>/info.xml". One small file per snapshot.
>
> [...]
>
>> Challenges:
>> - rollback per file or dir instead of entire snapshot-rollback ?
>
> snapper implements "rollback" on a FILE level only.
>
> To differentiate this way of "rolling back" from jumping
> into another snapshot, we call it
> "undochange"
> for now. This keeps the option to also manage a full
> per snapshot-rollback in a later point int time.
>
> [...]
>> modify the snapshot - do we need to implement a kind of read-only
>> snapshot ?
>
> snapper treats snapshots as read only snapshots, i.e. when doing a
> rollback - aehem, I should say "undochange" - only the "master" volume
> will be changed, not the single snapshots. We are aware that this has
> pros and cons. But that's another discussion.
>
> I hope that this is a starting point for you.
>
> Enjoy "snapper".
>
> so long -
> MgE
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-18 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-17 2:15 [RFC] btrfs auto snapshot Anand Jain
2011-08-17 9:24 ` Anand Jain
2011-08-17 13:23 ` David Pottage
2011-08-18 10:11 ` Anand Jain
2011-08-17 19:56 ` Lenz Grimmer
2011-08-17 13:31 ` Matthias G. Eckermann
2011-08-18 10:07 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2011-08-17 14:04 ` Dave
2011-08-17 14:50 ` Ken A
2011-08-17 17:38 ` Matthias G. Eckermann
2011-08-17 21:56 ` Matthias G. Eckermann
2012-02-23 9:54 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2012-03-01 13:48 ` Arvin Schnell
2012-03-01 14:13 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2011-08-17 15:13 ` snapshot ctime // " Roman Mamedov
2011-08-17 15:56 ` Jérôme Poulin
2011-08-18 10:14 ` Anand Jain
2012-02-23 10:37 ` Hubert Kario
2012-02-23 12:02 ` Anand Jain
2012-02-23 12:13 ` Fajar A. Nugraha
2012-02-23 14:09 ` Matthias G. Eckermann
2012-02-23 13:24 ` Hubert Kario
2012-02-24 6:05 ` Anand Jain
2012-02-24 5:59 ` Fahrzin Hemmati
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E4CE450.2000303@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mge@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).