From: Berend Dekens <btrfs@cyberwizzard.nl>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: BTRFS and power loss ~= corruption?
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:11:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E54F884.9090004@cyberwizzard.nl> (raw)
Hi,
I have followed the progress made in the btrfs filesystem over time and
while I have experimented with it a little in a VM, I have not yet used
it in a production machine.
While the lack of a complete fsck was a major issue (I read the update
that the first working version is about to be released) I am still
worried about an issue I see popping up.
How is it possible that a copy-on-write filesystem becomes corrupted if
a power failure occurs? I assume this means that even (hard) resetting a
computer can result in a corrupt filesystem.
I thought the idea of COW was that whatever happens, you can always
mount in a semi-consistent state?
As far as I can see, you wind up with this:
- No outstanding writes when power down
- File write complete, tree structure is updated. Since everything is
hashed and duplicated, unless the update propagates to the highest
level, the write will simply disappear upon failure. While this might be
rectified with a fsck, there should be no problems mounting the
filesystem (read-only if need be)
- Writes are not completed on all disks/partitions at the same time. The
checksums will detect these errors and once again, the write disappears
unless it is salvaged by a fsck.
Am I missing something? How come there seem to be plenty people with a
corrupt btrfs after a power failure? And why haven't I experienced
similar issues where a filesystem becomes unmountable with say NTFS or
Ext3/4?
--
Regards,
Berend Dekens
next reply other threads:[~2011-08-24 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-24 13:11 Berend Dekens [this message]
2011-08-24 13:31 ` BTRFS and power loss ~= corruption? Arne Jansen
2011-08-24 15:01 ` Berend Dekens
2011-08-24 15:04 ` *** GMX Spamverdacht *** " Arne Jansen
2011-08-24 15:13 ` Berend Dekens
2011-08-24 17:06 ` Mitch Harder
2011-08-24 21:00 ` Ahmed Kamal
2011-08-25 3:31 ` Anand Jain
2011-08-25 17:55 ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-08-25 22:16 ` Maciej Marcin Piechotka
2011-11-09 20:15 ` Martin Steigerwald
2011-08-25 23:01 ` Gregory Maxwell
2011-08-26 6:37 ` Arne Jansen
2011-08-26 7:48 ` Mike Fleetwood
2011-08-26 9:30 ` Arne Jansen
2011-11-09 17:33 ` Stefan Behrens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E54F884.9090004@cyberwizzard.nl \
--to=btrfs@cyberwizzard.nl \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).