From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Cronenworth <mike@cchtml.com>
Subject: Re: Honest timeline for btrfsck
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:24:28 -0500
Message-ID: <4E5FE9FC.9040705@cchtml.com>
References: <CAGh96GFhVEfXt=xcb-uGEBA3Ss2fc8BwOpJ2g8tXbm+VimdH3Q@mail.gmail.com> <1312404713-sup-6548@shiny> <loom.20110818T030824-742@post.gmane.org> <1313700115-sup-2457@shiny> <4E5664F8.9090802@cchtml.com> <4E5FD978.7030901@cchtml.com> <20110901202008.GA11655@carfax.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
To: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110901202008.GA11655@carfax.org.uk>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 09/01/2011 03:20 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
>     You may have missed the "on vacation" bit.

I did read the "on vacation" bit. Not that it is any of my business, but 
how long is that vacation?

>     The canonical place to look for btrfsck updates is the relevant FAQ
> item on the btrfs wiki.

I know this. No need to repeat it. I'm not a complete idiot.