From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>
Subject: Re: btrfs root + mount subvolid=0 problem
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:09:40 +1100
Message-ID: <4E937B34.1080201@csamuel.org>
References: <CAG1y0scXmy=DAGisOh9_6=LzueBhM5VMxpPWGeNPc+iOEc3scA@mail.gmail.com>	<20111010102028.GD17912@twin.jikos.cz> <CAG1y0sdtMQTxj_wvjPCqVmajw19mRgjKQugSc6By2QX3PktNRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAG1y0sdtMQTxj_wvjPCqVmajw19mRgjKQugSc6By2QX3PktNRQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 10/10/11 23:09, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:

> 3.0.4 is considered old already? Wow, 3.1 is not even out yet

I think the essential difference is that none of the btrfs
work gets pushed back to the stable kernel releases, it only
ever ends up in the RC's for new kernels (as it's still very
much experimental and under development).

cheers,
Chris
-- 
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC