Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Chester <somethingsome2000@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: defrag makes fragmentation worse
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:37:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E94FD75.6040307@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAE6i0j=7ZoYnXsmNdWewmszSpaq4HLcy+M7--3s2hiy2p4TBA@mail.gmail.com>

05:15, Chester wrote:
> Okay, this pretty much confirms that autodefrag makes defrag totally
> useless.. The above email was with autodefrag turned off..
> 
> With autodefrag on:
> 339 MB file
> initially 4 extents
> 
> btrfs fi defrag filename
> filefrag filename
> 
> about 900 extents
> 
> I did btrfs defrag two more times and ended up with 2048 extents
> 
> I attached the output of filefrag -v, which shows a pretty peculiar pattern.

This confirmed my speculation. I've fixed this bug a month ago, but
the patch hasn't hitted mainline.

You can try it out:

http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131495014823121&w=2

With this bug fixed, I think autodefrag won't be problematic.

--
Li Zefan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-12  2:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-08 22:17 defrag makes fragmentation worse Chester
2011-10-11  6:19 ` Li Zefan
2011-10-11 20:47   ` Chester
     [not found]     ` <CAAE6i0j=7ZoYnXsmNdWewmszSpaq4HLcy+M7--3s2hiy2p4TBA@mail.gmail.com>
2011-10-12  2:37       ` Li Zefan [this message]
2011-10-12  4:14         ` Chester
2011-10-12 15:14           ` Chris Mason
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-09 22:48 Johannes Hirte
2011-06-09 23:53 ` David Sterba
2011-06-23  0:12   ` Johannes Hirte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E94FD75.6040307@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=somethingsome2000@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox