Linux Btrfs filesystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Cc: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Creation of pseudo items leads to (seemingly) duplicate inodes (BUG inside)
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:18:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E9E2550.1050503@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E9E2177.6050405@cn.fujitsu.com>

On 10/19/2011 09:01 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
> On 10/19/2011 12:02 AM, Jan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> while playing with snapshots for btrfs send, I also encountered
>> seemingly duplicate inodes, which are multiple
>> BTRFS_EMPTY_SUBVOL_DIR_OBJECTID objects within the same directory. I can
>> imagine software that feels uncomfortable, here.
>>
>> Such objects are created by btrfs_lookup_dentry() in fs/btrfs/inode.c
>> when ENOENT is encountered.
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> A similar bug has been fixed by one of my patches(still queued):
> 

sorry, I missed something, this one has been merged in Chris's github tree(for rc6).


> http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfs&m=131409014207238&w=2
> 
> thanks,
> liubo
> 
>> The main purpose for this email is to ask: Is this going to stay like that?
>>
>> David Sterba sent a related issue some days ago with effects seen on
>> dcache level (subject: "WARNING: at fs/dcache.c:1256
>> d_set_d_op+0xaa/0xc0() , nested snapshots").
>>
>> I hit a bug when trying to rename(2) one of those objects, and I'm still
>> hitting it reproducably on 3.1-rc5. However, I cannot reproduce it with
>> the current for-linus branch (3.1-rc6). I don't see a commit I'd expect
>> to fix this, but it may be fixed:
>>
>> --
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.208573] btrfs failed to delete
>> reference to snap2, inode 257 parent 256
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.208586] ------------[ cut here
>> ]------------
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.264688] kernel BUG at
>> fs/btrfs/inode.c:6907!
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.320807] invalid opcode: 0000
>> [#1] SMP
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.370907] CPU 2
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.393831] Modules linked in:
>> btrfs mpt2sas scsi_transport_sas raid_class [last unloaded: btrfs]
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.503578]
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.522353] Pid: 29567, comm: mv
>> Not tainted 3.1.0-rc4+ #5 Supermicro X8SIL/X8SIL
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.613011] RIP:
>> 0010:[<ffffffffa06d906a>]  [<ffffffffa06d906a>] btrfs_rename+0x42a/0x770
>> [btrfs]
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.720059] RSP:
>> 0018:ffff88022f933c78  EFLAGS: 00010282
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.784476] RAX: 00000000fffffffe
>> RBX: 000000003b2456a4 RCX: 0000000000000054
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.870675] RDX: 0000000000000053
>> RSI: 000060fdc00042c0 RDI: ffff880234330000
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266945.956874] RBP: ffff88022f933d48
>> R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000001
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.043072] R10: 0000000000000006
>> R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000000004e9c1157
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.129270] R13: ffff880234468368
>> R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff880234446d58
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.215471] FS:
>> 00007f3bf0b96700(0000) GS:ffff88023fc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.313080] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES:
>> 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.382681] CR2: 00007f3bf0072110
>> CR3: 000000015c05f000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.468880] DR0: 0000000000000000
>> DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.555079] DR3: 0000000000000000
>> DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.641278] Process mv (pid: 29567,
>> threadinfo ffff88022f932000, task ffff880234330000)
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.737849] Stack:
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.762849]  000000000000000a
>> 0000000000000006 00000000000000d0 0000000000000000
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.852574]  ffff88022f933c01
>> 0000000000000101 00ff8802346b4158 ffff8802349b81b8
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266946.942299]  0000000000000000
>> ffff88022f9e7000 ffff88022f9e7000 ffff88019d4b6aa8
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.032025] Call Trace:
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.062215]  [<ffffffff81189ea2>]
>> vfs_rename+0x162/0x3e0
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.126629]  [<ffffffff8118bfb9>]
>> sys_renameat+0x239/0x270
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.193120]  [<ffffffff8187568c>] ?
>> do_page_fault+0x20c/0x450
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.262722]  [<ffffffff818723ca>] ?
>> retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.329214]  [<ffffffff810c84dd>] ?
>> trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xfd/0x190
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.409185]  [<ffffffff8118c006>]
>> sys_rename+0x16/0x20
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.471527]  [<ffffffff8187983b>]
>> system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.544240] Code: 68 ff ff ff 48 8b
>> 4a 30 44 8b 4a 24 4c 8b 42 28 48 8b 55 90 4c 89 95 58 ff ff ff 44 88 9d
>> 50 ff ff ff e8 ba c0 ff ff 85 c0 74 4a <0f> 0b eb fe 48 8b 45 80 48 8b
>> b8 20 01 00 00 88 95 48 ff ff ff
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.777216] RIP
>> [<ffffffffa06d906a>] btrfs_rename+0x42a/0x770 [btrfs]
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.856259]  RSP <ffff88022f933c78>
>> Oct 17 13:28:26 oglaroon kernel: [266947.899234] ---[ end trace
>> fd19520e3af48c17 ]---
>> --
>>
>> Reproducer for the curious:
>>
>> # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdv2
>> # mount /dev/sdv2 /mnt
>> # btrfs subvol snap /mnt /mnt/snap1
>> # btrfs subvol snap /mnt /mnt/snap2
>> # btrfs subvol snap /mnt /mnt/snap3
>>
>> When snap2 was created, there was a dir item for snap1, so this is no
>> surprise:
>>
>> # ls -lai /mnt/snap2
>> total 8
>> 256 dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 20 Jan  1  1970 .
>> 256 dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 30 Jan  1  1970 ..
>>   2 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root  0 Oct 18 16:25 snap1
>>
>> Inode 2 seems a bit strange, but stay tuned. When snap3 was created,
>> there were dir items for snap1 and snap2, so ... *drumroll*
>>
>> # ls -lai /mnt/snap3
>> total 8
>> 256 dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 30 Jan  1  1970 .
>> 256 dr-xr-xr-x 1 root root 30 Jan  1  1970 ..
>>   2 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root  0 Oct 18 16:26 snap1
>>   2 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root  0 Oct 18 16:26 snap2
>>
>> -Jan
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-19  1:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-18 16:02 Creation of pseudo items leads to (seemingly) duplicate inodes (BUG inside) Jan Schmidt
2011-10-18 19:04 ` Ilya Dryomov
2011-10-19 10:11   ` Jan Schmidt
2011-10-19  1:01 ` Liu Bo
2011-10-19  1:18   ` Liu Bo [this message]
2011-10-19 10:07     ` Jan Schmidt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4E9E2550.1050503@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox