From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Schmidt Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs pull request Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 11:29:31 +0100 Message-ID: <4EBA560B.1070509@jan-o-sch.net> References: <20111106183851.GA4339@shiny> <4EB7A6CC.5030502@gmx.net> <4EB7D2D8.2060505@gmx.net> <4EB8DEAC.7000906@gmx.net> <20111109010701.GI4149@shiny> <20111109074847.GA16742@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Chris Mason , Arne Jansen , Andrea Gelmini , LKML To: linux-btrfs Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20111109074847.GA16742@infradead.org> List-ID: Am 09.11.2011 08:48, schrieb Christoph Hellwig: > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 08:07:01PM -0500, Chris Mason wrote: >> Looks like bio_add_page() is failing and we're getting the enomem from >> there. LVM is only letting us put one page in each bio. > > Yes, at the moment all bio based DM targets only allow single page I/O. Wait. If I got that correctly, each bio_add_page needs special ENOMEM treatment (assuming the target could always be a device mapper target), right? "grep bio_add_page fs/btrfs/*.c" will make you unhappy. -Jan