From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fahrzin Hemmati <fahhem2@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] btrfs auto snapshot
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:59:58 -0800
Message-ID: <4F47275E.8060102@gmail.com>
References: <4E4B2452.9070407@oracle.com> <1483419.CO5JBoDgFX@bursa22> <4F462ADE.4040507@oracle.com> <1877276.9NitRBY2zL@k85hala03> <4F47288D.4010105@oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Cc: Hubert Kario <hka@qbs.com.pl>,
	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
To: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F47288D.4010105@oracle.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

I'd like to vote for timestamp/timestamp-uuid as a sysadmin. The 
timestamp allows for easy conversion from clients' wants to actual 
commands: "I need my data from two days ago" is easy when I have 
timestamps to use.

On 2/23/2012 10:05 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
>  Thanks for the inputs.  there is no clear winner as of now.
>  Let me keep the uuid for now, if more sysadmin feel timestamp
>  is better we could device it that way.
>
> -Anand
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html