From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Samuel <chris@csamuel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] apply rwlock for extent state
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 12:04:13 +1100
Message-ID: <4F6A7A8D.7060508@csamuel.org>
References: <1331802737-29454-1-git-send-email-liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com> <4F694262.6050409@cn.fujitsu.com> <CAK-xaQZGnkwQGq7TXy50vJwNMRXnM3WR6jqCnSXSf7-6yFRJ5A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>, Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>,
	David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Andrea Gelmini <andrea.gelmini@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAK-xaQZGnkwQGq7TXy50vJwNMRXnM3WR6jqCnSXSf7-6yFRJ5A@mail.gmail.com>
List-ID: <linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org>

On 21/03/12 23:34, Andrea Gelmini wrote:

> No comment, but I'm using this patches without problem since you
> published it (compressed /home with hourly snapshot delete/creation).

Well worth sending a Tested-By: tag then, it's useful information.

cheers,
Chris
-- 
 Chris Samuel  :  http://www.csamuel.org/  :  Melbourne, VIC