From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Felix Blanke Subject: Re: kernel 3.3.4 damages filesystem (?) Date: Tue, 08 May 2012 15:44:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4FA9232C.4020308@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Cc: Helmut Hullen , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: helmut@hullen.de Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-ID: On 5/8/12 3:13 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote: > Hallo, Clemens, > > Du meintest am 08.05.12: > >>>> But where's the gain? If a disk fails I have a lot of tools for >>>> repairing an ext2/3/4 system. > >> Nope, when a disk in your ext4 raid0 array fails, you are just as >> doomed. > > Why should I use RAID0 with a bundle of ext2/3/4? Mounting on/in the > directory tree does the job. Nobody told you that you should do it. What EVERYBODY here is telling you: The problem you have right now would be the same damn problem, no matter what fs you would you. Every fs will be unusable if you lose one disk in a raid0 setup. That's all what we are trying to tell you for the last 15 mails :) If you don't see any benefits using btrfs then simply don't use it :) Again: You misconfigured your fs if you never wanted to use raid0. Don't blame the fs, blame yourself. > > Viele Gruesse! > Helmut > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html