From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from csamuel.org ([74.50.50.137]:60110 "EHLO csamuel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751144Ab2EUGA3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 May 2012 02:00:29 -0400 Message-ID: <4FB9D9F9.5040907@csamuel.org> Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 16:00:25 +1000 From: Chris Samuel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marc MERLIN CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Which kernel is safe to upgrade to for btrfs? References: <20120521052220.GD15765@merlins.org> In-Reply-To: <20120521052220.GD15765@merlins.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 21/05/12 15:22, Marc MERLIN wrote: > Have the free space problems been fixed in 3.3.x or is the 3.4.x branch > better or should I stay with 3.2.x for safety? There have been some fixes pushed back from the development tree into the stable tree for 3.3.x (for the first time in btrfs's history I believe) but there's a lot more work been happening in 3.4. I'm happily sat on 3.2 and I would suggest sticking there too for a while and watch what user reports come back for the 3.4 kernel (just out). Just my 2p's worth.. cheers, Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC