From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp206.alice.it ([82.57.200.102]:40365 "EHLO smtp206.alice.it" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754821Ab2EaQvJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2012 12:51:09 -0400 Message-ID: <4FC7A183.2090109@libero.it> Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 18:51:15 +0200 From: Goffredo Baroncelli Reply-To: kreijack@inwind.it MIME-Version: 1.0 To: WeiFeng Liu CC: linux-btrfs Subject: Re: It is not so interesting than I hoped References: <20120530235723.B149EA6E44@smtp.hushmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20120530235723.B149EA6E44@smtp.hushmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi liu On 05/31/2012 01:57 AM, WeiFeng Liu wrote: > several days ago I committed a patch as a part of my learning btrfs, which I > wish to decrease metadata fragments. By writing them, I'm glad that it helped me > to understand btrfs code deeper, I realized now that the patch is not so > interesting than I hoped though, I'm glad little extra time has wasted on it > after someone show me some disadvantages in time. It is the research work: discuss an idea, prototyping it and then it fails. Happens, but everybody had gained some knowledge. Ciao Goffredo > > btrfs is fine, and so people of the list. > > thanks very much to Liu Bo, Arne Jansen, Goffredo Baroncelli > > > WeiFeng Liu > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > . >