linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: kreijack@inwind.it, cwillu <cwillu@cwillu.com>,
	helmut@hullen.de, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: R: Re: Subvolumes and /proc/self/mountinfo
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:05:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FE35473.4050005@libero.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4FE323DB.1070507@zytor.com>

On 06/21/2012 03:38 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> But if /boot has to be in a separate filesystem, which is the point to
>> > support btrfs at all ? Does make sense to support only a subset of btrfs
>> > features ?
>> > 
> Yes, and that's another good reason for /boot: btrfs supports that kind
> of policy (e.g. "no compression or encryption in this subtree.")

But what about large disk ? Syslinux is able to handle large disk ? Or
it uses BIOS interrupt?


  reply	other threads:[~2012-06-21 17:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-06-20 12:02 R: Re: Subvolumes and /proc/self/mountinfo Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
2012-06-20 15:37 ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-20 16:34   ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-20 17:41     ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-20 18:06       ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-20 19:15         ` Helmut Hullen
2012-06-20 20:22           ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-20 21:49         ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-21  5:47           ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-21 11:46             ` Martin Steigerwald
2012-06-21 17:05               ` Goffredo Baroncelli
2012-06-21 13:38             ` H. Peter Anvin
2012-06-21 17:05               ` Goffredo Baroncelli [this message]
2012-06-21 17:11                 ` H. Peter Anvin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-06-20 12:10 Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>
2012-06-20 11:51 Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijack@libero.it>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4FE35473.4050005@libero.it \
    --to=kreijack@libero.it \
    --cc=cwillu@cwillu.com \
    --cc=helmut@hullen.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kreijack@inwind.it \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).