btrfs benchmark

btrfs benchmark

[Bernd Kohler]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 762 bytes --]

Hi @ all,

in the last edition of the german Linux-Magazin, there has been an
article about Linux filesystem performance test - the article is titled
"Formel Storage - Linux-Dateisystem im Leistungstest".

The author of this article, Mr Michael Kromer provides his benchmark
script on link [1] and as btrfs is mentioned there, I felt free to
publish this here ;)

best

Bernd Kohler




[1]
http://medozas.de/2012-lm-fs-benchmark.tar.gz

-- 
UMIC - RWTH Aachen
http://www.umic.rwth-aachen.de

Mies-van-der-Rohe Str. 15
52074 Aachen

Tel.:   +49 241 80 20791
Fax:    +49 241 80 22731
E-Mail: kohler@umic.rwth-aachen.de

The future started 6/6/12
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
0100 1001 0101 0000 0111 0110 0011 0110



[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4526 bytes --]

Re: btrfs benchmark

[Liu Bo]

On 07/12/2012 05:17 PM, Bernd Kohler wrote:

> Hi @ all,
> 
> in the last edition of the german Linux-Magazin, there has been an
> article about Linux filesystem performance test - the article is titled
> "Formel Storage - Linux-Dateisystem im Leistungstest".
> 
> The author of this article, Mr Michael Kromer provides his benchmark
> script on link [1] and as btrfs is mentioned there, I felt free to
> publish this here ;)
> 




Thank you very much, I'm playing with it now.

thanks,
liubo

> best
> 
> Bernd Kohler
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [1]
> http://medozas.de/2012-lm-fs-benchmark.tar.gz
> 

Re: btrfs benchmark

[Martin Steigerwald]

Am Donnerstag, 12. Juli 2012 schrieb Bernd Kohler:
> Hi @ all,

Hi!

> in the last edition of the german Linux-Magazin, there has been an
> article about Linux filesystem performance test - the article is titled
> "Formel Storage - Linux-Dateisystem im Leistungstest".
> 
> The author of this article, Mr Michael Kromer provides his benchmark
> script on link [1] and as btrfs is mentioned there, I felt free to
> publish this here ;)

If thats the same article I remember currently, the author made some 
choices I did not understand. Like for example disabling write caches of 
the drives that have being testing. But could be that I refer to another 
article in there. Can´t check right now, cause I do not have the issue at 
hand at home.

> [1]
> http://medozas.de/2012-lm-fs-benchmark.tar.gz

Thanks,
-- 
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA  B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7