From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.mailmag.net (mail.mailmag.net [199.192.20.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E0716F288 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 00:31:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.192.20.237 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774485110; cv=none; b=nkjRcVfPp3q9GX1M1biMHMS0ojcMyDb2zRKgY7Q06zi1fafyjVX6KayugTUnpf+cl6dBXEdiT+AwhuOx7QCHqkYUyTA+U2Ey8H0xf+nHRABQ3phbfvyLuPLCObNqBO6oSpi6iNn2UFW2+2InuQ+3Vx9LskHK98Fsy2n1mNLfVww= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774485110; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0JbB86i4hxaJVNZAQgHhxE7w055V2Cul/YbHs+nmG6k=; h=From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:References:Date:Cc:To:MIME-Version: Message-ID:Subject; b=P0sZvwMd1Vk3Wq8D8xxvO7xTgE3pzwCBcX84yal12P0u+QSBmdkUB8zL4PKScTMhof8D3XPkydsi18GLjckRwkRuF/TGQI9dEqNIM2dJXZp+rk2vgpswmjfQsBvBCokbsm4yy8ho9iqa5BcMdKfI83L8wReo/kMegbomjkzRHls= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mailmag.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailmag.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailmag.net header.i=@mailmag.net header.b=oWfZA3sT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.192.20.237 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=mailmag.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailmag.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailmag.net header.i=@mailmag.net header.b="oWfZA3sT" Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPA id E5F93161D4C; Wed, 25 Mar 2026 17:31:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailmag.net; s=dkim; t=1774485107; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=0JbB86i4hxaJVNZAQgHhxE7w055V2Cul/YbHs+nmG6k=; b=oWfZA3sTO940xsjEQLbikJ0C+h/Tw5MO6Yr7govJll+Xyo7sBOZN8jnkakXug9DiABE3d+ bmM5LYWeJ4QO44v9MXYYtOKfW19B8/9/ejFBgiqxR9n2+mug0F6XjH0aT/k1lyDCs7x+Ti CkzxWY6BusrKm3t74BlxljyNZZfzIWdz/Hp7F1IlNs9sbmC4qhUmJCGWa2nskLRAuQqWvn UIu6hYBW0NBb5bwW0hE6sn8KkggqduBLRQ2qZk3//XBXNF/dZWT3UNfgtcrbDoTo3Y4sUF 1qMhXSoA5x8olhvf140ktBqdOlFGIehRyYpWff4ml+CjYc09Mp2DNSWTMngVmg== From: "joshua" In-Reply-To: <032be7a912897f0cf5ee90f3e5ee0b2c690ff76c.camel@scientia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" References: <2A0C37E0-28BD-4829-9778-AB20F4482F6D@mailmag.net> <032be7a912897f0cf5ee90f3e5ee0b2c690ff76c.camel@scientia.org> Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2026 17:31:46 -0700 Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: "Christoph Anton Mitterer" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4d1ee97f-0147-b303-6a88-dcdb253bb2bc@mailmag.net> Subject: =?utf-8?q?Re=3A?= Btrfs progs release =?utf-8?q?6=2E19?= User-Agent: SOGoMail 5.12.4 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: None On Wednesday, March 25, 2026 09:21 PDT, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Tue, 2026-03-24 at 21:18 -0700, joshua wrote: > > For what it=E2=80=99s worth, (not much) I used --convert-to-block-g= roup-tree > > on a large fs with precious data (~10 drives, ~100Tb, Raid1 data, > > Raid1C3 metadata) and had no issues. > >=20 > > Convert took a LONG time, but afterwards, all my data integrity > > checks passed, scrub passed, and mount times are approximately 1 > > second now, compared to minutes previously. >=20 > Thanks for the information. How long have you been running with it? Don't know exactly, but it was shortly after the new Debian stable rele= ase. So probably around mid-to-late August. I'd say a good 4-8 months at least since then, with no issues so far. --=20 --Joshua Villwock