From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
To: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Roger L. Beckermeyer III" <beckerlee3@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 3/6] btrfs: update prelim_ref_insert() to use rb helpers
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:28:52 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4d26bf1052ec09502e9c41d2575b6ecbc564da9c.1734472236.git.wqu@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1734472236.git.wqu@suse.com>
From: "Roger L. Beckermeyer III" <beckerlee3@gmail.com>
Update prelim_ref_insert() to use rb_find_add_cached().
There is a special change that the existing prelim_ref_compare() is
called with the first parameter as the existing ref in the rbtree.
But the newer rb_find_add_cached() expects the cmp() function to have
the first parameter as the to-be-added node, thus the new helper
prelim_ref_rb_add_cmp() need to adapt this new order.
Signed-off-by: Roger L. Beckermeyer III <beckerlee3@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index 6d9f39c1d89c..3d3923cfc357 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -250,6 +250,21 @@ static int prelim_ref_compare(const struct prelim_ref *ref1,
return 0;
}
+static int prelim_ref_rb_add_cmp(const struct rb_node *new,
+ const struct rb_node *exist)
+{
+ const struct prelim_ref *ref_new =
+ rb_entry(new, struct prelim_ref, rbnode);
+ const struct prelim_ref *ref_exist =
+ rb_entry(exist, struct prelim_ref, rbnode);
+
+ /*
+ * prelim_ref_compare() expects the first parameter as the existing one,
+ * different from the rb_find_add_cached() order.
+ */
+ return prelim_ref_compare(ref_exist, ref_new);
+}
+
static void update_share_count(struct share_check *sc, int oldcount,
int newcount, const struct prelim_ref *newref)
{
@@ -278,55 +293,39 @@ static void prelim_ref_insert(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
struct share_check *sc)
{
struct rb_root_cached *root;
- struct rb_node **p;
- struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
- struct prelim_ref *ref;
- int result;
- bool leftmost = true;
+ struct rb_node *exist;
root = &preftree->root;
- p = &root->rb_root.rb_node;
+ exist = rb_find_add_cached(&newref->rbnode, root, prelim_ref_rb_add_cmp);
+ if (exist) {
+ struct prelim_ref *ref = rb_entry(exist, struct prelim_ref, rbnode);
+ /* Identical refs, merge them and free @newref */
+ struct extent_inode_elem *eie = ref->inode_list;
- while (*p) {
- parent = *p;
- ref = rb_entry(parent, struct prelim_ref, rbnode);
- result = prelim_ref_compare(ref, newref);
- if (result < 0) {
- p = &(*p)->rb_left;
- } else if (result > 0) {
- p = &(*p)->rb_right;
- leftmost = false;
- } else {
- /* Identical refs, merge them and free @newref */
- struct extent_inode_elem *eie = ref->inode_list;
+ while (eie && eie->next)
+ eie = eie->next;
- while (eie && eie->next)
- eie = eie->next;
-
- if (!eie)
- ref->inode_list = newref->inode_list;
- else
- eie->next = newref->inode_list;
- trace_btrfs_prelim_ref_merge(fs_info, ref, newref,
- preftree->count);
- /*
- * A delayed ref can have newref->count < 0.
- * The ref->count is updated to follow any
- * BTRFS_[ADD|DROP]_DELAYED_REF actions.
- */
- update_share_count(sc, ref->count,
- ref->count + newref->count, newref);
- ref->count += newref->count;
- free_pref(newref);
- return;
- }
+ if (!eie)
+ ref->inode_list = newref->inode_list;
+ else
+ eie->next = newref->inode_list;
+ trace_btrfs_prelim_ref_merge(fs_info, ref, newref,
+ preftree->count);
+ /*
+ * A delayed ref can have newref->count < 0.
+ * The ref->count is updated to follow any
+ * BTRFS_[ADD|DROP]_DELAYED_REF actions.
+ */
+ update_share_count(sc, ref->count,
+ ref->count + newref->count, newref);
+ ref->count += newref->count;
+ free_pref(newref);
+ return;
}
update_share_count(sc, 0, newref->count, newref);
preftree->count++;
trace_btrfs_prelim_ref_insert(fs_info, newref, NULL, preftree->count);
- rb_link_node(&newref->rbnode, parent, p);
- rb_insert_color_cached(&newref->rbnode, root, leftmost);
}
/*
--
2.47.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-17 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-17 21:58 [PATCH v3 0/6] reduce boilerplate code within btrfs Qu Wenruo
2024-12-17 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] rbtree: add rb_find_add_cached() to rbtree.h Qu Wenruo
2024-12-17 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] btrfs: update btrfs_add_block_group_cache() to use rb helper Qu Wenruo
2024-12-17 21:58 ` Qu Wenruo [this message]
2024-12-17 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] btrfs: update __btrfs_add_delayed_item() " Qu Wenruo
2024-12-17 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] btrfs: update btrfs_add_chunk_map() to use rb helpers Qu Wenruo
2024-12-17 21:58 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] btrfs: update tree_insert() " Qu Wenruo
2024-12-23 19:54 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] reduce boilerplate code within btrfs David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4d26bf1052ec09502e9c41d2575b6ecbc564da9c.1734472236.git.wqu@suse.com \
--to=wqu@suse.com \
--cc=beckerlee3@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox