From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530D4C433F5 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 15:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236744AbiBRPZN (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:25:13 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:47852 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234415AbiBRPZM (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 10:25:12 -0500 Received: from eu-shark1.inbox.eu (eu-shark1.inbox.eu [195.216.236.81]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4302E2B1A9B for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 07:24:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from eu-shark1.inbox.eu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eu-shark1-out.inbox.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01616C007E7; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:24:52 +0200 (EET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=inbox.eu; s=20140211; t=1645197892; bh=IMt9Cx5PtSdGDra3Bp+3CojYrzv7NKN9pvw+N0EGZ/Y=; h=References:From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-reply-to:Message-ID: Content-Type:X-ESPOL:from:date:to:cc; b=Cp/D8A2/Wd+8Dw9pqPGcznxamTUEBQnwVMwAdcgy+mN2LpvsBKvq9xNt1yUzvQBrb jEIvGKuUEFY7j1oKFb6kY9wRpQcDtW014W5f2OYsRO7RWJp4h+98lWpgyJd3obBtqp GdVyIuqoDjpOhgwORd0UpZnIdjAm6pB4Q1ZKOjis= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eu-shark1-in.inbox.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23AD6C007E2; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:24:52 +0200 (EET) Received: from eu-shark1.inbox.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (eu-shark1.inbox.eu [127.0.0.1]) (spamfilter, port 35) with ESMTP id 1eEBC1FNywhm; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:24:52 +0200 (EET) Received: from mail.inbox.eu (eu-pop1 [127.0.0.1]) by eu-shark1-in.inbox.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3E2A6C0078F; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:24:52 +0200 (EET) References: <20220121093335.1840306-1-l@damenly.su> <20220124154424.GX14046@twin.jikos.cz> User-agent: mu4e 1.7.0; emacs 27.2 From: Su Yue To: dsterba@suse.cz Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Simple two patches for tree checker Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 23:13:12 +0800 In-reply-to: <20220124154424.GX14046@twin.jikos.cz> Message-ID: <4k4w5hae.fsf@damenly.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: OK X-ESPOL: 6NpmlYxOGzysiV+lRWetewt38GpVPp7o+fvJoxAj/GeDUSOFfksTURS1g21yTGK6vzsX Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Mon 24 Jan 2022 at 16:44, David Sterba wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 05:33:33PM +0800, Su Yue wrote: >> Two commits for enhancing tree checker to reject the img from >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215299. >> >> Su Yue (2): >> btrfs: tree-checker: check item_size for inode_item >> btrfs: tree-checker: check item_size for dev_item > > Nice, added to misc-next, thanks. I'll update and close the bug. CC the reporter. Oops. The Link of the crafted image in the first megered patch was pasted wrongly. Just found while testing backports. It should be https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215289 instead of https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215299 And the latter is still unfixed. My bad. -- Su