From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: fix vanished compression property after failed set
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:40:32 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <501289dd-ab15-d10c-bcce-8efcaf939b79@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190313174539.GG31119@twin.jikos.cz>
On 3/14/19 1:45 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 06:33:50PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/13/19 1:36 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>>> The compression property resets to NULL, instead of the old value if we
>>> fail to set the new compression parameter.
>>>
>>> btrfs prop get /btrfs compression
>>> compression=lzo
>>> btrfs prop set /btrfs compression zli
>>> ERROR: failed to set compression for /btrfs: Invalid argument
>>> btrfs prop get /btrfs compression
>>>
>>> This is because the compression property ->validate() is successful for
>>> 'zli' as the strncmp() used the len passed from the userland.
>>>
>>> Fix it by using the expected string length in strncmp().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>> fs/btrfs/props.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/props.c b/fs/btrfs/props.c
>>> index ef6502a94712..7aa362c2fbcf 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/props.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/props.c
>>> @@ -277,11 +277,11 @@ static int prop_compression_validate(struct inode *inode, const char *value,
>>> if (!value)
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>> - if (!strncmp("lzo", value, len))
>>> + if (!strncmp("lzo", value, 3))
>>> return 0;
>>> - else if (!strncmp("zlib", value, len))
>>> + else if (!strncmp("zlib", value, 4))
>>> return 0;
>>> - else if (!strncmp("zstd", value, len))
>>> + else if (!strncmp("zstd", value, 4))
>>> return 0;
>>>
>>
>>
>> Nack.
>> Now some junk value after expected string is not an error.
>> such as..
>>
>> btrfs prop set /btrfs compression lzo110
>
> This was intentional when the zlib levels were introduced so older
> kernels can understand newer compression specifier but still have a sane
> fallback (ie use the default level). Now it would be better to extend
> the validation to parse the method:level format at least. But as
> mentioned in the other mail, the level needs to be propagated elsewhere
> too so it's not just a change to the validation.
>
Compression levels properties can be implemented in a newer set of the
patches? So I believe this set ok to merge.
The other way to fix this was to save and rewrite the old parameter,
but that's not a good idea as well, because when parameter is not valid
we should rather fail without any update (generation/transid should
also remain unchanged, there is a bug [1] in the original code which
shall be fixed separately).
[1]
with this patch,
btrfs in dump-super /dev/sdb | grep "^generation"; btrfs prop set
/btrfs compression zli; sync; btrfs in dump-super /dev/sdb | grep
"^generation"
generation 21
ERROR: failed to set compression for /btrfs: Invalid argument
generation 22
Thanks, Anand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-14 1:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-13 5:36 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: fix zstd compression parameter Anand Jain
2019-03-13 5:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: fix vanished compression property after failed set Anand Jain
2019-03-13 7:20 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-13 7:22 ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-13 8:49 ` Anand Jain
2019-03-13 17:39 ` David Sterba
2019-03-13 10:33 ` Anand Jain
2019-03-13 10:49 ` Anand Jain
2019-03-13 17:42 ` David Sterba
2019-03-13 17:45 ` David Sterba
2019-03-14 1:40 ` Anand Jain [this message]
2019-03-13 7:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: fix zstd compression parameter Nikolay Borisov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=501289dd-ab15-d10c-bcce-8efcaf939b79@oracle.com \
--to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).