linux-btrfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: fix vanished compression property after failed set
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 09:40:32 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <501289dd-ab15-d10c-bcce-8efcaf939b79@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190313174539.GG31119@twin.jikos.cz>



On 3/14/19 1:45 AM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 06:33:50PM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/13/19 1:36 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>>> The compression property resets to NULL, instead of the old value if we
>>> fail to set the new compression parameter.
>>>
>>> btrfs prop get /btrfs compression
>>>     compression=lzo
>>> btrfs prop set /btrfs compression zli
>>>     ERROR: failed to set compression for /btrfs: Invalid argument
>>> btrfs prop get /btrfs compression
>>>
>>> This is because the compression property ->validate() is successful for
>>> 'zli' as the strncmp() used the len passed from the userland.
>>>
>>> Fix it by using the expected string length in strncmp().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
>>> ---
>>>    fs/btrfs/props.c | 6 +++---
>>>    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/props.c b/fs/btrfs/props.c
>>> index ef6502a94712..7aa362c2fbcf 100644
>>> --- a/fs/btrfs/props.c
>>> +++ b/fs/btrfs/props.c
>>> @@ -277,11 +277,11 @@ static int prop_compression_validate(struct inode *inode, const char *value,
>>>    	if (!value)
>>>    		return 0;
>>>    
>>> -	if (!strncmp("lzo", value, len))
>>> +	if (!strncmp("lzo", value, 3))
>>>    		return 0;
>>> -	else if (!strncmp("zlib", value, len))
>>> +	else if (!strncmp("zlib", value, 4))
>>>    		return 0;
>>> -	else if (!strncmp("zstd", value, len))
>>> +	else if (!strncmp("zstd", value, 4))
>>>    		return 0;
>>>
>>
>>
>>     Nack.
>> Now some junk value after expected string is not an error.
>> such as..
>>
>> btrfs prop set /btrfs compression lzo110
> 
> This was intentional when the zlib levels were introduced so older
> kernels can understand newer compression specifier but still have a sane
> fallback (ie use the default level). Now it would be better to extend
> the validation to parse the method:level format at least. But as
> mentioned in the other mail, the level needs to be propagated elsewhere
> too so it's not just a change to the validation.
> 

  Compression levels properties can be implemented in a newer set of the
  patches? So I believe this set ok to merge.

  The other way to fix this was to save and rewrite the old parameter,
  but that's not a good idea as well, because when parameter is not valid
  we should rather fail without any update (generation/transid should
  also remain unchanged, there is a bug [1] in the original code which
  shall be fixed separately).

  [1]
  with this patch,
  btrfs in dump-super /dev/sdb | grep "^generation"; btrfs prop set 
/btrfs compression zli; sync; btrfs in dump-super /dev/sdb | grep 
"^generation"

generation		21
ERROR: failed to set compression for /btrfs: Invalid argument
generation		22


Thanks, Anand

  reply	other threads:[~2019-03-14  1:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-13  5:36 [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: fix zstd compression parameter Anand Jain
2019-03-13  5:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: fix vanished compression property after failed set Anand Jain
2019-03-13  7:20   ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-13  7:22     ` Nikolay Borisov
2019-03-13  8:49       ` Anand Jain
2019-03-13 17:39         ` David Sterba
2019-03-13 10:33   ` Anand Jain
2019-03-13 10:49     ` Anand Jain
2019-03-13 17:42       ` David Sterba
2019-03-13 17:45     ` David Sterba
2019-03-14  1:40       ` Anand Jain [this message]
2019-03-13  7:19 ` [PATCH 1/2] btrfs: fix zstd compression parameter Nikolay Borisov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=501289dd-ab15-d10c-bcce-8efcaf939b79@oracle.com \
    --to=anand.jain@oracle.com \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).