From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:3874 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754454Ab2HIHvK (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 03:51:10 -0400 Message-ID: <50236BC0.8070000@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 15:50:24 +0800 From: Miao Xie Reply-To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Btrfs , David Sterba Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Btrfs: fix full backref problem when inserting shared block reference References: <50232A19.2010704@cn.fujitsu.com> <20120809064802.GB17430@twin.jikos.cz> <20120809072129.GC17430@twin.jikos.cz> In-Reply-To: <20120809072129.GC17430@twin.jikos.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:21:29 +0200, David Sterba wrote: > On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:48:02AM +0200, David Sterba wrote: >> and down, no problems so far, and the "wikipedia" test-subvol stresstest >> that caused trouble to one of your patches is also ok. I'll do some more >> testing on other machines and will report problems eventually. > > So it won't be so easy :) > > The test generated 15+ G of data, ~500 snapshots, then umount and fsck: > > lots of > > ref mismatch on [9655283712 4096] extent item 1, found 0 > Incorrect local backref count on 9655283712 root 5 owner 589776 offset 110592 found 0 wanted 1 back 0x86badf0 > backpointer mismatch on [9655283712 4096] > owner ref check failed [9655283712 4096] > > and then > > checking fs roots > root 2854 inode 233882 errors 2500 > root 2880 inode 271639 errors 2200 > > and it's not finished yet, other types of error may pop up. Thanks for your test, I'll look into it. Regards Miao